The One ‹i›King Lear‹/i› / / Brian Vickers.

In the 1980s influential scholars argued that Shakespeare revised King Lear in light of theatrical performance, resulting in two texts by the bard’s own hand. The two-text theory hardened into orthodoxy. Here Sir Brian Vickers makes the case that Shakespeare did not cut his original text. At stake i...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Superior document:Title is part of eBook package: De Gruyter Harvard University Press Complete eBook-Package 2016
VerfasserIn:
Place / Publishing House:Cambridge, MA : : Harvard University Press, , [2016]
©2016
Year of Publication:2016
Language:English
Online Access:
Physical Description:1 online resource (416 p.) :; 7 halftones, 1 line illustration, 2 tables
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
LEADER 03479nam a22006615i 4500
001 9780674970311
003 DE-B1597
005 20221201113901.0
006 m|||||o||d||||||||
007 cr || ||||||||
008 221201t20162016mau fo d z eng d
019 |a (OCoLC)984676692 
020 |a 9780674970311 
024 7 |a 10.4159/9780674970311  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-B1597)466647 
035 |a (OCoLC)945554290 
040 |a DE-B1597  |b eng  |c DE-B1597  |e rda 
041 0 |a eng 
044 |a mau  |c US-MA 
050 4 |a PR2819  |b .V53 2016 
072 7 |a LIT015000  |2 bisacsh 
082 0 4 |a 822.3/3  |2 23 
100 1 |a Vickers, Brian,   |e author.  |4 aut  |4 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut 
245 1 4 |a The One ‹i›King Lear‹/i› /  |c Brian Vickers. 
264 1 |a Cambridge, MA :   |b Harvard University Press,   |c [2016] 
264 4 |c ©2016 
300 |a 1 online resource (416 p.) :  |b 7 halftones, 1 line illustration, 2 tables 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
347 |a text file  |b PDF  |2 rda 
505 0 0 |t Frontmatter --   |t Contents --   |t Preface --   |t A Note on References --   |t Part 1. The Quarto, 1608 --   |t Chapter 1. King Lear at the Printer --   |t Chapter 2. Adjusting Text Space to Print Space in the Shakespeare Folio and Quartos --   |t Chapter 3. Nicholas Okes Compresses the Play --   |t Chapter 4. Nicholas Okes Abridges It --   |t Part 2. The Folio, 1623 --   |t Chapter 5. One Play, One Manuscript, Two Printed Books --   |t Chapter 6. The Folio Editors Regularize Shakespeare --   |t Chapter 7. The King’s Men Abridge a Tragedy --   |t Part 3. The One King Lear --   |t Chapter 8. The “Two Versions” Revisited --   |t Conclusion: Toward a New Consensus --   |t Appendix 1. Illustrations and Commentary --   |t Appendix 2. Space Saving in Q1 King Lear --   |t Notes --   |t Index 
506 0 |a restricted access  |u http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec  |f online access with authorization  |2 star 
520 |a In the 1980s influential scholars argued that Shakespeare revised King Lear in light of theatrical performance, resulting in two texts by the bard’s own hand. The two-text theory hardened into orthodoxy. Here Sir Brian Vickers makes the case that Shakespeare did not cut his original text. At stake is the way his greatest play is read and performed. 
538 |a Mode of access: Internet via World Wide Web. 
546 |a In English. 
588 0 |a Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 01. Dez 2022) 
650 0 |a Transmission of texts  |z England  |x History  |y 17th century. 
650 7 |a LITERARY CRITICISM / Shakespeare.  |2 bisacsh 
773 0 8 |i Title is part of eBook package:  |d De Gruyter  |t Harvard University Press Complete eBook-Package 2016  |z 9783110638585 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674970311 
856 4 0 |u https://www.degruyter.com/isbn/9780674970311 
856 4 2 |3 Cover  |u https://www.degruyter.com/document/cover/isbn/9780674970311/original 
912 |a 978-3-11-063858-5 Harvard University Press Complete eBook-Package 2016  |b 2016 
912 |a EBA_BACKALL 
912 |a EBA_CL_LT 
912 |a EBA_EBACKALL 
912 |a EBA_EBKALL 
912 |a EBA_ECL_LT 
912 |a EBA_EEBKALL 
912 |a EBA_ESSHALL 
912 |a EBA_PPALL 
912 |a EBA_SSHALL 
912 |a GBV-deGruyter-alles 
912 |a PDA11SSHE 
912 |a PDA13ENGE 
912 |a PDA17SSHEE 
912 |a PDA5EBK