Originalism and the Good Constitution / / Michael B. Rappaport, John O. McGinnis.

Originalism holds that the U.S. Constitution should be interpreted according to its meaning at the time it was enacted. In their innovative defense of originalism, John McGinnis and Michael Rappaport maintain that the text of the Constitution should be adhered to by the Supreme Court because it was...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Superior document:Title is part of eBook package: De Gruyter E-BOOK GESAMTPAKET / COMPLETE PACKAGE 2013
VerfasserIn:
Place / Publishing House:Cambridge, MA : : Harvard University Press, , [2013]
©2013
Year of Publication:2013
Language:English
Online Access:
Physical Description:1 online resource (308 p.)
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
LEADER 05511nam a22008775i 4500
001 9780674726260
003 DE-B1597
005 20210830012106.0
006 m|||||o||d||||||||
007 cr || ||||||||
008 210830t20132013mau fo d z eng d
019 |a (OCoLC)979622399 
020 |a 9780674726260 
024 7 |a 10.4159/harvard.9780674726260  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-B1597)209629 
035 |a (OCoLC)861200180 
040 |a DE-B1597  |b eng  |c DE-B1597  |e rda 
041 0 |a eng 
044 |a mau  |c US-MA 
050 4 |a KF4552  |b .M34 2013eb 
072 7 |a LAW018000  |2 bisacsh 
082 0 4 |a 342.73/0011  |2 23 
100 1 |a McGinnis, John O.,   |e author.  |4 aut  |4 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut 
245 1 0 |a Originalism and the Good Constitution /  |c Michael B. Rappaport, John O. McGinnis. 
264 1 |a Cambridge, MA :   |b Harvard University Press,   |c [2013] 
264 4 |c ©2013 
300 |a 1 online resource (308 p.) 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
347 |a text file  |b PDF  |2 rda 
505 0 0 |t Frontmatter --   |t Contents --   |t 1. Originalism: Its Discontents and the Supermajoritarian Solution --   |t 2. The Nature of the Argument --   |t 3. The Supermajoritarian Theory of Constitutionalism --   |t 4. The Compliance of the US Constitution with Desirable Supermajority Rules --   |t 5. The Continuing Desirability of an Old Supermajoritarian Constitution --   |t 6. Supermajoritarian Failure, Including the Exclusion of African Americans and Women --   |t 7. Original Methods Originalism --   |t 8. Original Methods versus Constitutional Construction --   |t 9. Precedent, Originalism, and the Constitution --   |t 10. The Normative Theory of Precedent --   |t 11. Imagining an Originalist Future --   |t Notes --   |t Acknowledgments --   |t Index 
506 0 |a restricted access  |u http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec  |f online access with authorization  |2 star 
520 |a Originalism holds that the U.S. Constitution should be interpreted according to its meaning at the time it was enacted. In their innovative defense of originalism, John McGinnis and Michael Rappaport maintain that the text of the Constitution should be adhered to by the Supreme Court because it was enacted by supermajorities--both its original enactment under Article VII and subsequent Amendments under Article V. A text approved by supermajorities has special value in a democracy because it has unusually wide support and thus tends to maximize the welfare of the greatest number. The authors recognize and respond to many possible objections. Does originalism perpetuate the dead hand of the past? How can originalism be justified, given the exclusion of African Americans and women from the Constitution and many of its subsequent Amendments? What is originalism's place in interpretation, after two hundred years of non-originalist precedent? A fascinating counterfactual they pose is this: had the Supreme Court not interpreted the Constitution so freely, perhaps the nation would have resorted to the Article V amendment process more often and with greater effect. Their book will be an important contribution to the literature on originalism, now the most prominent theory of constitutional interpretation. 
530 |a Issued also in print. 
538 |a Mode of access: Internet via World Wide Web. 
546 |a In English. 
588 0 |a Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 30. Aug 2021) 
650 0 |a Constitutional law  |x Philosophy. 
650 0 |a Constitutional law  |z United States. 
650 0 |a Judicial review  |z United States. 
650 0 |a Origin (Philosophy). 
650 7 |a LAW / Constitutional.  |2 bisacsh 
700 1 |a Rappaport, Michael B. ,   |e author.  |4 aut  |4 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut 
773 0 8 |i Title is part of eBook package:  |d De Gruyter  |t E-BOOK GESAMTPAKET / COMPLETE PACKAGE 2013  |z 9783110317350  |o ZDB-23-DGG 
773 0 8 |i Title is part of eBook package:  |d De Gruyter  |t E-BOOK PACKAGE LAW 2013  |z 9783110317206 
773 0 8 |i Title is part of eBook package:  |d De Gruyter  |t E-BOOK PAKET RECHTSWISSENSCHAFTEN 2013  |z 9783110317190  |o ZDB-23-DGC 
773 0 8 |i Title is part of eBook package:  |d De Gruyter  |t HUP eBook-Package Backlist 2000-2013 (Canada)  |z 9783110756067 
773 0 8 |i Title is part of eBook package:  |d De Gruyter  |t Harvard University Press eBook Package Backlist 2000-2013  |z 9783110442205 
776 0 |c print  |z 9780674725072 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674726260 
856 4 0 |u https://www.degruyter.com/isbn/9780674726260 
856 4 2 |3 Cover  |u https://www.degruyter.com/cover/covers/9780674726260.jpg 
912 |a 978-3-11-031720-6 E-BOOK PACKAGE LAW 2013  |b 2013 
912 |a 978-3-11-044220-5 Harvard University Press eBook Package Backlist 2000-2013  |c 2000  |d 2013 
912 |a 978-3-11-075606-7 HUP eBook-Package Backlist 2000-2013 (Canada)  |b 2013 
912 |a EBA_BACKALL 
912 |a EBA_CL_LAEC 
912 |a EBA_EBACKALL 
912 |a EBA_EBKALL 
912 |a EBA_ECL_LAEC 
912 |a EBA_EEBKALL 
912 |a EBA_ESSHALL 
912 |a EBA_ESTMALL 
912 |a EBA_PPALL 
912 |a EBA_SSHALL 
912 |a EBA_STMALL 
912 |a GBV-deGruyter-alles 
912 |a PDA11SSHE 
912 |a PDA12STME 
912 |a PDA13ENGE 
912 |a PDA17SSHEE 
912 |a PDA18STMEE 
912 |a PDA5EBK 
912 |a ZDB-23-DGC  |b 2013 
912 |a ZDB-23-DGG  |b 2013