Liberalism in the Shadow of Totalitarianism / / David Ciepley.
This book argues that, more than any other factor, it was the encounter with totalitarianism that dissolved the ideals of American progressivism and crystallized the ideals of postwar liberalism. The New Deal began as a revolution in favor of progressive governance--executive-centered and expert-gui...
Saved in:
VerfasserIn: | |
---|---|
Place / Publishing House: | Cambridge, MA : : Harvard University Press, , [2007] ©2007 |
Year of Publication: | 2007 |
Language: | English |
Online Access: | |
Physical Description: | 1 online resource (400 p.) |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Other title: | Frontmatter -- Contents -- Acknowledgments -- Introduction -- I. State-Building before the Totalitarian Encounter -- 1. An Exceptional Beginning -- 2. Social Science, Progressivism, and the State -- II. Totalitarianism and the Economy: The Renaissance of Free Enterprise -- 3. A Unique Economic Path -- 4. The Quest for a Cooperative Commonwealth: NRA and AAA -- 5. Two Roads to the Development State: TVA and NRPB -- 6. Totalitarianism and the Scuttling of the Development State -- 7. The Retreat from Cooperation to Fiscal Compensation -- 8. Totalitarianism and the National Security State -- III. Totalitarianism and Democratic Politics: The Rise of Interest Group Pluralism -- 9. Democracy and the “Values” Question -- 10. Envisioning Interest Group Pluralism -- 11. Interest Group Pluralism Institutionalized -- IV. Totalitarianism and the Court: From Higher Law to Neutrality -- 12. Totalitarianism and the Rediscovery of Civil Liberties -- 13. The Rise and Fall of Judicial Review before World War II -- 14. The Neutrality Ideal Comes to Court -- 15. Neutrality and the Due Process Revolution -- 16. Neutrality, Civil Liberty, and the Culture Wars -- Conclusion: The Dysfunctions of Antitotalitarian Liberalism -- Notes -- Index |
---|---|
Summary: | This book argues that, more than any other factor, it was the encounter with totalitarianism that dissolved the ideals of American progressivism and crystallized the ideals of postwar liberalism. The New Deal began as a revolution in favor of progressive governance--executive-centered and expert-guided. But as David Ciepley shows, by the late 1930s, intellectuals and elites, reacting against the menace of totalitarianism, began to shrink from using state power to guide the economy or foster citizen virtues. All of the more statist governance projects of the New Deal were curtailed or abandoned, regardless of success, and the country placed on a more libertarian-corporatist trajectory, both economically and culturally. In economics, attempts to reorient industry from private profit to public use were halted, and free enterprise was reaffirmed. In politics, the ideal of governance by a strong, independent executive was rejected--along with notions of "central planning," "social control," and state imposition of "values"--and a politics of contending interest groups was embraced. In law, the encounter with totalitarianism brought an end to judicial deference, the embrace of civil rights and civil liberties, and the neutralist reinterpretation, and radicalization, of both. Finally, in culture, the encounter sowed the seeds of our own era--the era of the culture wars--in which traditional America has been mobilized against these liberal legal advances, and against the entire neutralist, "relativist," "secular humanist" reinterpretation of America that accompanies them. |
Format: | Mode of access: Internet via World Wide Web. |
ISBN: | 9780674271456 |
DOI: | 10.4159/9780674271456?locatt=mode:legacy |
Access: | restricted access |
Hierarchical level: | Monograph |
Statement of Responsibility: | David Ciepley. |