The Constitution and the New Deal / / G. Edward White.
In a powerful new narrative, G. Edward White challenges the reigning understanding of twentieth-century Supreme Court decisions, particularly in the New Deal period. He does this by rejecting such misleading characterizations as "liberal," "conservative," and "reactionary,&q...
Saved in:
Superior document: | Title is part of eBook package: De Gruyter Harvard University Press eBook Package Backlist 2000-2013 |
---|---|
VerfasserIn: | |
Place / Publishing House: | Cambridge, MA : : Harvard University Press, , [2010] ©2000 |
Year of Publication: | 2010 |
Language: | English |
Online Access: | |
Physical Description: | 1 online resource (400 p.) |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Table of Contents:
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- Introduction
- I. Complicating the Conventional Account
- 1. The Conventional Account
- 2. The Transformation of the Constitutional Jurisprudence of Foreign Relations: The Orthodox Regime under Stress
- 3. The Triumph of Executive Discretion in Foreign Relations
- 4. The Emergence of Agency Government and the Creation of Administrative Law
- 5. The Emergence of Free Speech
- II. The Constitutional Revolution as Jurisprudential Crisis
- 6. The Restatement Project and the Crisis of Early Twentieth-Century Jurisprudence
- 7. The Constitutional Revolution as a Crisis in Adaptivity
- III. The Creation of Triumphalist Narratives
- 8. The Myths of Substantive Due Process
- 9. The Canonization and Demonization of Judges
- 10. Cabining the New Deal in Time
- Notes
- Index