Constitutional Identity / / Gary Jeffrey Jacobsohn.

• Superior document: Title is part of eBook package: De Gruyter HUP eBook Package Archive 1893-1999
• VerfasserIn: Jacobsohn, Gary Jeffrey,
• Place / Publishing House: Cambridge, MA : : Harvard University Press, , [2010]; ©2010
• Year of Publication: 2010
• Language: English
• Physical Description: 1 online resource (388 p.)
• Other title: Frontmatter --; Contents --; Preface --; 1. Introduction: The Disharmonic Constitution --; 2. The Conundrum of the Unconstitutional Constitution --; 3. The Quest for a Compelling Unity --; 4. The Permeability of Constitutional Borders --; 5. The Sounds of Silence: Militant and Acquiescent Constitutionalism --; 6. “The First Page of the Constitution”: Family, State, and Identity --; 7. Conclusion --; Index
• Format: Mode of access: Internet via World Wide Web.
• ISBN: 9780674059399; 9783110442212; 9783110442205
• DOI: 10.4159/9780674059399?locatt=mode:legacy
• Access: restricted access
• Hierarchical level: Monograph
• Statement of Responsibility: Gary Jeffrey Jacobsohn.

In Constitutional Identity, Gary Jeffrey Jacobsohn argues that a constitution acquires an identity through experience—from a mix of the political aspirations and commitments that express a nation’s past and the desire to transcend that past. It is changeable but resistant to its own destruction, and manifests itself in various ways, as Jacobsohn shows in examples as far flung as India, Ireland, Israel, and the United States. Jacobsohn argues that the presence of disharmony—both the tensions within a constitutional order and those that exist between a constitutional document and the society it seeks to regulate—is critical to understanding the theory and dynamics of constitutional identity. He explores constitutional identity’s great practical importance for some of constitutionalism’s most vexing questions: Is an unconstitutional constitution possible? Is the judicial practice of using foreign sources to resolve domestic legal disputes a threat to vital constitutional interests? How are the competing demands of transformation and preservation in constitutional evolution to be balanced?