Statutory Default Rules : : How to Interpret Unclear Legislation / / Einer Elhauge.

Most new law is statutory law; that is, law enacted by legislators. An important question, therefore, is how should this law be interpreted by courts and agencies, especially when the text of a statute is not entirely clear. There is a great deal of scholarly literature on the rules and legal materi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
VerfasserIn:
Place / Publishing House:Cambridge, MA : : Harvard University Press, , [2009]
©2008
Year of Publication:2009
Language:English
Online Access:
Physical Description:1 online resource (400 p.)
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Table of Contents:
  • Frontmatter
  • Contents
  • Acknowledgments
  • CHAPTER 1 Introduction and Overview
  • CHAPTER 2 Why Courts Should Maximize Enactable Preferences When Statutes Are Unclear
  • PART I Current Preferences Default Rules
  • CHAPTER 3 The General Theory for Current Preferences Default Rules
  • CHAPTER 4 Inferring Current Preferences from Recent Legislative Action
  • CHAPTER 5 Inferring Current Preferences from Agency Action
  • PART II Enactor Preferences Default Rules
  • CHAPTER 6 From Legislative Intent to Probabilistic Estimates of Enactable Preferences
  • CHAPTER 7 Moderation, Unforseen Circumstances, and a Theory of Meaning
  • PART III Preference-Eliciting Default Rules
  • CHAPTER 8 Eliciting Legislative Preferences
  • CHAPTER 9 Canons Favoring the Politically Powerless
  • CHAPTER 10 Linguistic Canons of Statutory Construction
  • CHAPTER 11 Interpretations That May Create International Conflict
  • CHAPTER 12 Explaining Seeming Inconsistencies in Statutory Stare Decisis
  • PART IV Supplemental Default Rules
  • CHAPTER 13 Tracking the Preferences of Political Subunits
  • CHAPTER 14 Tracking High Court Preferences
  • PART V Objections
  • CHAPTER 15 The Fit with Prior Political Science Models and Empirical Data
  • CHAPTER 16 Interest Group and Collective Choice Theory
  • CHAPTER 17 Protecting Reliance or Avoiding Change or Effect
  • CHAPTER 18 Rebutting Operational and Jurisprudential Objections
  • Notes
  • Index