Decisionmaking on War and Peace : : The Cognitive-Rational Debate / / ed. by Alex Mintz, Nehemia Geva.

The authors review, compare, and contrast major models of decisionmaking about war and peace.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Superior document:Title is part of eBook package: De Gruyter Lynne Rienner Press Complete Archive eBook-Package Pre-2000
MitwirkendeR:
HerausgeberIn:
Place / Publishing House:Boulder : : Lynne Rienner Publishers, , [2022]
©1997
Year of Publication:2022
Language:English
Series:Advances in Foreign Policy Analysis
Online Access:
Physical Description:1 online resource (257 p.)
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Table of Contents:
  • Frontmatter
  • Contents
  • Tables and Figures
  • Acknowledgments
  • 1 Foreign Policy Decisionmaking: Bridging the Gap Between the Cognitive Psychology and Rational Actor “Schools”
  • Part 1. Rational and Cognitive Approaches to International Conflict
  • 2 A Rational Choice Approach to International Conflict
  • 3 Prospect Theory and the Cognitive-Rational Debate
  • 4 Rational and Psychological Approaches to the Study of International Conflict: Comparative Strengths and Weaknesses
  • Part 2. Alternatives to Rational Choice and Prospect Theory
  • 5 The Poliheuristic Theory of Foreign Policy Decisionmaking
  • 6 The Rationality of Surprise: Unstable Nash Equilibria and the Theory of Moves
  • 7 A Two-Level Analysis of War and Revolution: A Dynamic Simulation of Response to Threat
  • Part 3. The Cognitive-Rational Discourse: An Appraisal
  • 8 Decisional Stress, Individual Choice, and Policy Outcomes: The Arab-Israeli Conflict
  • 9 Prospect Theory Versus Expected Utility Theory: A Dispute Sequence Appraisal
  • Part 4. Conclusion
  • 10 Decisionmaking on War and Peace: Challenges for Future Research
  • References
  • Contributors
  • Index
  • About the Book