Intimate Commerce : : Exchange, Gender, and Subjectivity in Greek Tragedy / / Victoria Wohl.

• Superior document: Title is part of eBook package: De Gruyter University of Texas Press Complete eBook-Package Pre-2000
• VerfasserIn: Wohl, Victoria,
• Place / Publishing House: Austin : : University of Texas Press, , [2021]; ©1997
• Year of Publication: 2021
• Language: English
• Physical Description: 1 online resource (332 p.)
• Other title: Frontmatter --; CONTENTS --; ACKNOWLEDGMENTS --; INTRODUCTION. Exchange, Gender, and Subjectivity --; PART ONE. SOVEREIGN FATHER AND FEMALE SUBJECT IN SOPHOCLES' Trachiniae --; ONE. "THE NOBLEST LAW" --; TWO. THE FORECLOSED FEMALE SUBJECT --; THREE. ALTERITY AND INTERSUBJECTIVITY --; PART TWO. THE VIOLENCE OF kharis IN AESCHYLUS'S Agamemnon --; FOUR. THE COMMODITY FETISH AND THE AGALMATIZATION OF THE VIRGIN DAUGHTER --; FIVE. Agalma ploutou --; SIX. FEAR AND PITY: CLYTEMNESTRA AND CASSANDRA --; PART THREE. MOURNING AND MATRICIDE IN EURIPIDES' Alcestis --; SEVEN. THE SHADOW OF THE OBJECT: Loss, MOURNING, AND REPARATION --; EIGHT. AGONISTIC IDENTITY AND THE SUPERLATIVE SUBJECT --; NINE. THE MIRROR OF xenia AND THE PATERNAL SYMBOLIC --; CONCLUSION. Too Intimate Commerce --; NOTES --; BIBLIOGRAPHY --; GENERAL INDEX --; INDEX LOCORUM
• Format: Mode of access: Internet via World Wide Web.
• ISBN: 9780292799974; 9783110745351
• DOI: 10.7560/791138
• Access: restricted access
• Hierarchical level: Monograph
• Statement of Responsibility: Victoria Wohl.

Exchanges of women between men occur regularly in Greek tragedy—and almost always with catastrophic results. Instead of cementing bonds between men, such exchanges rend them. They allow women, who should be silent objects, to become monstrous subjects, while men often end up as lifeless corpses. But why do the tragedies always represent the transferal of women as disastrous? Victoria Wohl offers an illuminating analysis of the exchange of women in Sophocles' Trachiniae, Aeschylus' Agamemnon, and Euripides' Alcestis. She shows how the attempts of women in these plays to become active subjects rather than passive objects of exchange inevitably fail. While these failures seem to validate male hegemony, the women's actions, however futile, blur the distinction between male subject and female object, calling into question the very nature of the tragic self. What the tragedies thus present, Wohl asserts, is not only an affirmation of Athens' reigning ideologies (including its gender hierarchy) but also the possibility of resistance to them and the imagination of alternatives.