Kinship Myth in Ancient Greece / / Lee E. Patterson.

• Superior document: Title is part of eBook package: De Gruyter University of Texas Press eBook-Package Backlist 2000-2013
• VerfasserIn: Patterson, Lee E.,
• Place / Publishing House: Austin : : University of Texas Press, , [2021]; ©2010
• Year of Publication: 2021
• Language: English
• Physical Description: 1 online resource (271 p.)
• Other title: Frontmatter --; Contents --; Abbreviations --; Note on Translations and Transliterations --; Preface and Acknowledgments --; 1. Kinship and Constructed Identities --; 2. Credulity and Historical Causation --; 3. Kinship Myth in the Literary Sources --; 4. Kinship Myth in the Literary Sources --; 5. Alexander the Great --; 6. Epigraphical Evidence of Kinship Diplomacy --; 7. Epigraphical Evidence of Kinship Diplomacy --; 8. Conclusions --; Appendix One. The Historical Context of Plutarch, solon 8–10 --; Appendix Two. Greek Myth and Macedonian Identity --; Appendix Three. A Tale of Two Phoci --; Notes --; Bibliography --; Index Locorum --; General Index
• Format: Mode of access: Internet via World Wide Web.
• ISBN: 9780292784796; 9783110745344
• DOI: 10.7560/722750
• Access: restricted access
• Hierarchical level: Monograph
• Statement of Responsibility: Lee E. Patterson.

In ancient Greece, interstate relations, such as in the formation of alliances, calls for assistance, exchanges of citizenship, and territorial conquest, were often grounded in mythical kinship. In these cases, the common ancestor was most often a legendary figure from whom both communities claimed descent. In this detailed study, Lee E. Patterson elevates the current state of research on kinship myth to a consideration of the role it plays in the construction of political and cultural identity. He draws examples both from the literary and epigraphical records and shows the fundamental difference between the two. He also expands his study into the question of Greek credulity—how much of these founding myths did they actually believe, and how much was just a useful fiction for diplomatic relations? Of central importance is the authority the Greeks gave to myth, whether to elaborate narratives or to a simple acknowledgment of an ancestor. Most Greeks could readily accept ties of interstate kinship even when local origin narratives could not be reconciled smoothly or when myths used to explain the link between communities were only "discovered" upon the actual occasion of diplomacy, because such claims had been given authority in the collective memory of the Greeks.