The Soviet Scholar-Bureaucrat : : M. N. Pokrovskii and the Society of Marxist Historians / / George M. Enteen.

• Superior document: Title is part of eBook package: De Gruyter Penn State University Press Complete eBook-Package Pre-2014
• VerfasserIn: Enteen, George M.,
• Place / Publishing House: University Park, PA : : Penn State University Press, , [2021]; ©1980
• Year of Publication: 2021
• Language: English
• Physical Description: 1 online resource (320 p.)
• Other title: Frontmatter --; Contents --; Preface --; List of Abbreviations --; Introduction --; 1. Historian and Revolutionary --; 2. Pokrovskii's Synthesis of Russian History --; 3. Evolution of Pokrovskii's System: The Russian Revolution --; 4. Battle Lines among Historians, 1925-28 --; 5. Cooperation Ends --; 6. The First All-Union Conference of Marxist Historians --; 7. The New Offensive on the Historical Front --; 8. The Gap between Theory and Practice --; 9. A Besieged Fortress --; 10. Renewal of Mandate --; 11. Pokrovskii's System in Ruins --; Epilogue: Pokrovskii's Double Death --; Conclusions --; Notes --; Bibliography --; Index
• Format: Mode of access: Internet via World Wide Web.
• ISBN: 9780271071855; 9783110745269
• DOI: 10.1515/9780271071855?locatt=mode:legacy
• Access: restricted access
• Hierarchical level: Monograph
• Statement of Responsibility: George M. Enteen.

Mikhail Nikolaevich bridges 19th- and 20th-century Russian culture as well as Leninism and Stalinism, and later became an instrument in Khrushchev's effort at de-Stalinization. Pokrovskii was born in Moscow in 1868. He described the years before 1905 as his time of ";democratic illusions and economic materialism."; His interest in legal Marxism began in the 1890's but it was only with the Revolution of 1905 that he stepped into the Marxist camp.Pokrovskii was a leader in the creation of the ";historical front";-an organization of scholars authorized to work out a Marxist theory of the past. He formalized the bond between scholarship and politics through his belief that historians should assist party authorities in effecting a cultural revolution; thus he supported Stalin's collectivization of agriculture and leg a campaign to silence non-Marxist scholars, some of whom he had defended earlier. Yet his accommodation with Stalin was uneasy, and after Pokrovskii's death in 1932 his allegedly ";abstract sociological schemes"; were condemned and his career was dubbed pokrovshcina-era of the wicked deeds of Pokrovskii.