Can Globalization Promote Human Rights? / / Rhoda E. Howard-Hassmann.

• Superior document: Title is part of eBook package: De Gruyter Penn State University Press Complete eBook-Package Pre-2014
• VerfasserIn: Howard-Hassmann, Rhoda E.,
• Place / Publishing House: University Park, PA : : Penn State University Press, , [2021]; ©2010
• Year of Publication: 2021
• Language: English
• Series: Essays on Human Rights ; 3
• Physical Description: 1 online resource (200 p.)
• Other title: Frontmatter --; Contents --; Acknowledgments --; List of Acronyms --; 1 Human Rights and Globalization --; 2 Globalization, Poverty, and Inequality --; 3 Global Neoliberalism --; 4 A Positive Model --; 5 Negative Models --; 6 Global Human Rights Governance --; 7 Civil Society --; 8 The Politics of Resentment --; 9 The Primacy of Politics --; References --; Index
• Format: Mode of access: Internet via World Wide Web.
• ISBN: 9780271051130; 9783110745269
• DOI: 10.1515/9780271051130?locatt=mode:legacy
• Access: restricted access
• Hierarchical level: Monograph
• Statement of Responsibility: Rhoda E. Howard-Hassmann.

Globalization has affected everyone's lives, and the reactions to it have been mixed. Legal scholars and political scientists tend to emphasize its harmful aspects, while economists tend to emphasize its benefits. Those concerned about human rights have more often been among the critics than among the supporters of globalization. In Can Globalization Promote Human Rights? Rhoda Howard-Hassmann presents a balanced account of the negative and positive features of globalization in relation to human rights, in both their economic and civil/political dimensions. On the positive side, she draws on substantial empirical work to show that globalization has significantly reduced world poverty levels, even while, on the negative side, it has exacerbated economic inequality across and within countries. Ultimately, she argues, social action and political decision making will determine whether the positive effects of globalization outweigh the negatives. And, in contrast to those who prefer either schemes for redistributing wealth on moral grounds or authoritarian socialist approaches, she makes the case for social democracy as the best political system for the protection of all human rights, civil and political as well as economic.