The Consensus-Conflict Debate. Form and Content in Social Theories / / Thomas J. Bernard.
Addresses the debate of whether society is a smoldering set of tension-filled relations that periodically erupt into conflict or an integrated and coordinated whole typified by consensus on values and beliefs. Examines seven pairs of philosophers who can be classified as "conflict" or &quo...
Saved in:
Superior document: | Title is part of eBook package: De Gruyter Columbia University Press eBook-Package Archive 1898-1999 |
---|---|
VerfasserIn: | |
MitwirkendeR: | |
Place / Publishing House: | New York, NY : : Columbia University Press, , [1983] ©1983 |
Year of Publication: | 1983 |
Language: | English |
Online Access: | |
Physical Description: | 1 online resource (232 p.) |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Other title: | Frontmatter -- Contents -- Foreword -- Acknowledgments -- Chapter 1. Introduction -- Chapter 2. Plato and Aristotle -- Chapter 3. Augustine and Aquinas -- Chapter 4. Machiavelli and Hobbes -- Chapter 5. Locke and Rousseau -- Chapter 6. Comte and Marx -- Chapter 7. Durkheim and Simmel -- Chapter 8. Parsons and Dahrendorf -- Chapter 9. The Relation Between Consensus and Conflict Theories -- Chapter 10. Conclusion: Theory, Fact, and Value -- Index |
---|---|
Summary: | Addresses the debate of whether society is a smoldering set of tension-filled relations that periodically erupt into conflict or an integrated and coordinated whole typified by consensus on values and beliefs. Examines seven pairs of philosophers who can be classified as "conflict" or "consensus" theorists: Aristotle and Plato, Augustine and Aquinas, Hobbes and Machiavelli, Locke and Rousseau, Comte and Marx, Durkheim and Simmel, and Parsons and Dahrendorf. |
Format: | Mode of access: Internet via World Wide Web. |
ISBN: | 9780231880206 9783110442489 |
DOI: | 10.7312/bern90730 |
Access: | restricted access |
Hierarchical level: | Monograph |
Statement of Responsibility: | Thomas J. Bernard. |