The Habermas-Rawls Debate / / James Gordon Finlayson.

Jürgen Habermas and John Rawls are perhaps the two most renowned and influential figures in social and political philosophy of the second half of the twentieth century. In the 1990s, they had a famous exchange in the Journal of Philosophy. Quarreling over the merits of each other's accounts of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Superior document:Title is part of eBook package: De Gruyter Columbia University Press Complete eBook-Package 2019
VerfasserIn:
Place / Publishing House:New York, NY : : Columbia University Press, , [2019]
©2019
Year of Publication:2019
Language:English
Online Access:
Physical Description:1 online resource
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Table of Contents:
  • Frontmatter
  • CONTENTS
  • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
  • ABBREVIATIONS
  • INTRODUCTION: MUCH ADO ABOUT NOTHING
  • I. THE EARLY DEBATE
  • 1. TWO NONRIVAL THEORIES OF JUSTICE
  • 2. HABERMAS'S EARLY CRITICISMS OF RAWLS
  • II. HABERMAS'S AND RAWLS'S MATURE POLITICAL THEORIES
  • 3. HABERMAS'S BETWEEN FACTS AND NORMS
  • 4. RAWLS'S POLITICAL LIBERALISM
  • III. THE EXCHANGE
  • 5. HABERMAS'S "RECONCILIATION THROUGH THE PUBLIC USE OF REASON"
  • 6. RAWLS'S "REPLY TO HABERMAS"
  • 7. "REASONABLE' VERSUS 'TRUE": HABERMAS'S REPLY TO RAWLS'S "REPLY"
  • IV. THE LEGACY OF THE HABERMAS-RAWLS DISPUTE
  • 8. RELIGION WITHIN THE BOUNDS OF PUBLIC REASON ALONE
  • CONCLUSION
  • NOTES
  • BIBLIOGRAPHY
  • INDEX