Toxic Safety : : Flame Retardants, Chemical Controversies, and Environmental Health / / Alissa Cordner.

• Superior document: Title is part of eBook package: De Gruyter Columbia University Press Complete eBook-Package 2016
• VerfasserIn: Cordner, Alissa,
• Place / Publishing House: New York, NY : : Columbia University Press, , [2016]; ©2016
• Year of Publication: 2016
• Language: English
• Physical Description: 1 online resource (352 p.)
• Other title: Frontmatter --; Contents --; Acknowledgments --; Abbreviations --; 1. Uncertain Science and The Fight for Environmental Health --; 2. Hot Topics: Flame Retardants in The Public Sphere --; 3. Defending Risk and Defining Safety --; 4. Strategic Science Translation --; 5. Negotiating Science, Politicizing Science --; 6. Science for Advocacy --; Conclusion: The Pursuit of Chemical Justice --; Appendix. Playing the Field: Methodological Reflections --; Notes --; References --; Index
• Format: Mode of access: Internet via World Wide Web.
• ISBN: 9780231541381; 9783110638578
• DOI: 10.7312/cord17146
• Access: restricted access
• Hierarchical level: Monograph
• Statement of Responsibility: Alissa Cordner.

Initially marketed as a life-saving advancement, flame retardants are now mired in controversy. Some argue that data show the chemicals are unsafe while others continue to support their use. The tactics of each side have far-reaching consequences for how we interpret new scientific discoveries.An experienced environmental sociologist, Alissa Cordner conducts more than a hundred interviews with activists, scientists, regulators, and industry professionals to isolate the social, scientific, economic, and political forces influencing environmental health policy today. Introducing "strategic science translation," she describes how stakeholders use scientific evidence to support nonscientific goals and construct "conceptual risk formulas" to shape risk assessment and the interpretation of empirical evidence. A revelatory text for public-health advocates, Toxic Safety demonstrates that while all parties interested in health issues use science to support their claims, they do not compete on a level playing field and even good intentions can have deleterious effects.