The Dissent Papers : : The Voices of Diplomats in the Cold War and Beyond / / Hannah Gurman.

• Superior document: Title is part of eBook package: De Gruyter Columbia University Press eBook-Package Backlist 2000-2013
• VerfasserIn: Gurman, Hannah,
• Place / Publishing House: New York, NY : : Columbia University Press, , [2012]; ©2012
• Year of Publication: 2012
• Idioma: English
• Descrición Física: 1 online resource (296 p.) :; 11 illus.
• Other title: Frontmatter --; Contents --; Acknowledgments --; Introduction --; One. The Pen as Sword --; Two. "Learn to write well" --; Three. Revising the Vietnam Balance Sheet --; Four. The Other Plumbers Unit --; Conclusion. The Life After --; Notes --; Bibliography --; Index
• Formato: Mode of access: Internet via World Wide Web.
• ISBN: 9780231530354; 9783110442472
• DOI: 10.7312/gurm15872
• Acceso: restricted access
• Hierarchical level: Monograph
• Statement of Responsibility: Hannah Gurman.

Beginning with the Cold War and concluding with the 2003 invasion of Iraq, Hannah Gurman explores the overlooked opposition of U.S. diplomats to American foreign policy in the latter half of the twentieth century. During America's reign as a dominant world power, U.S. presidents and senior foreign policy officials largely ignored or rejected their diplomats' reports, memos, and telegrams, especially when they challenged key policies relating to the Cold War, China, and the wars in Vietnam and Iraq. The Dissent Papers recovers these diplomats' invaluable perspective and their commitment to the transformative power of diplomatic writing.Gurman showcases the work of diplomats whose opposition enjoyed some success. George Kennan, John Stewart Service, John Paton Davies, George Ball, and John Brady Kiesling all caught the attention of sitting presidents and policymakers, achieving temporary triumphs yet ultimately failing to change the status quo. Gurman follows the circulation of documents within the State Department, the National Security Council, the C.I.A., and the military, and she details the rationale behind "The Dissent Channel," instituted by the State Department in the 1970s, to both encourage and contain dissent. Advancing an alternative narrative of modern U.S. history, she connects the erosion of the diplomatic establishment and the weakening of the diplomatic writing tradition to larger political and ideological trends while, at the same time, foreshadowing the resurgent significance of diplomatic writing in the age of Wikileaks.