The Scandal of Reason : : A Critical Theory of Political Judgment / / Albena Azmanova.
Theories of justice are haunted by a paradox: the more ambitious the theory of justice, the less applicable and useful the model is to political practice; yet the more politically realistic the theory, the weaker its moral ambition, rendering it unsound and equally useless. Brokering a resolution to...
Saved in:
| Superior document: | Title is part of eBook package: De Gruyter Columbia University Press eBook-Package Backlist 2000-2013 |
|---|---|
| VerfasserIn: | |
| Place / Publishing House: | New York, NY : : Columbia University Press, , [2012] ©2012 |
| Year of Publication: | 2012 |
| Language: | English |
| Series: | New Directions in Critical Theory ;
47 |
| Online Access: | |
| Physical Description: | 1 online resource (296 p.) |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Table of Contents:
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- Introduction: The Scandal of Reason and the Paradox of Judgment
- 1. Political Judgment and the Vocation of Critical Theory
- 2. Critical Theory: PoliticalJudgment as Ideologiekritik
- 3. Philosophical Liberalism: Reasonable Judgment
- 4. Philosophical Liberalism and Critical Theory in Dispute
- 5. Judgment Unbound: Arendt
- 6. From Critique of Power to a Critical Theory of Judgment
- 7. The Political Epistemology of Judgment
- 8. The Critical Consensus Model
- 9. Judgment, Criticism, Innovation
- Conclusion: Letting Go of Ideal Theory
- Glossary
- Notes
- References
- Index