Fate, Time, and Language : : An Essay on Free Will / / David Wallace; ed. by Steven Cahn, Maureen Eckert.

In 1962, the philosopher Richard Taylor used six commonly accepted presuppositions to imply that human beings have no control over the future. David Foster Wallace not only took issue with Taylor's method, which, according to him, scrambled the relations of logic, language, and the physical wor...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Superior document:Title is part of eBook package: De Gruyter Columbia University Press eBook-Package Backlist 2000-2013
VerfasserIn:
MitwirkendeR:
HerausgeberIn:
TeilnehmendeR:
Place / Publishing House:New York, NY : : Columbia University Press, , [2010]
©2010
Year of Publication:2010
Language:English
Online Access:
Physical Description:1 online resource (264 p.)
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Other title:Frontmatter --
CONTENTS --
PREFACE --
INTRODUCTION --
PART I. THE BACKGROUND --
1. FATALISM --
2. PROFESSOR TAYLOR ON FATALISM --
3. FATALISM AND ABILITY --
4. FATALISM AND ABILITY II --
5. FATALISM AND LINGUISTIC REFORM --
6. FATALISM AND PROFESSOR TAYLOR --
7. TAYLOR'S FATAL FALLACY --
8. A NOTE ON FATALISM --
9. TAUTOLOGY AND FATALISM --
10. FATALISTIC ARGUMENTS --
11. COMMENT --
12. FATALISM AND ORDINARY LANGUAGE --
13. FALLACIES IN TAYLOR'S "FATALISM" --
PART II. THE ESSAY --
14. RENEWING THE FATALIST CONVERSATION --
15. RICHARD TAYLOR'S "FATALISM" AND THE SEMANTICS OF PHYSICAL MODALITY --
PART III. EPILOGUE --
16. DAVID FOSTER WALLACE AS STUDENT: A MEMOIR --
APPENDIX: THE PROBLEM OF FUTURE CONTINGENCIES
Summary:In 1962, the philosopher Richard Taylor used six commonly accepted presuppositions to imply that human beings have no control over the future. David Foster Wallace not only took issue with Taylor's method, which, according to him, scrambled the relations of logic, language, and the physical world, but also noted a semantic trick at the heart of Taylor's argument.Fate, Time, and Language presents Wallace's brilliant critique of Taylor's work. Written long before the publication of his fiction and essays, Wallace's thesis reveals his great skepticism of abstract thinking made to function as a negation of something more genuine and real. He was especially suspicious of certain paradigms of thought-the cerebral aestheticism of modernism, the clever gimmickry of postmodernism-that abandoned "the very old traditional human verities that have to do with spirituality and emotion and community." As Wallace rises to meet the challenge to free will presented by Taylor, we witness the developing perspective of this major novelist, along with his struggle to establish solid logical ground for his convictions. This volume, edited by Steven M. Cahn and Maureen Eckert, reproduces Taylor's original article and other works on fatalism cited by Wallace. James Ryerson's introduction connects Wallace's early philosophical work to the themes and explorations of his later fiction, and Jay Garfield supplies a critical biographical epilogue.
Format:Mode of access: Internet via World Wide Web.
ISBN:9780231527071
9783110442472
DOI:10.7312/wall15156
Access:restricted access
Hierarchical level:Monograph
Statement of Responsibility: David Wallace; ed. by Steven Cahn, Maureen Eckert.