Integrating Science and Politics for Public Health.

Integrating Science and Politics for Public Health.

Show other versions (1)
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Superior document:Palgrave Studies in Public Health Policy Research Series
:
Fafard, Patrick.
TeilnehmendeR:
Cassola, Adèle.
de Leeuw, Evelyne.
Place / Publishing House:Cham : : Springer International Publishing AG,, 2022.
©2022.
Year of Publication:2022
Edition:1st ed.
Language:English
Series:Palgrave Studies in Public Health Policy Research Series
Online Access:
Physical Description:1 online resource (350 pages)
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Table of Contents:
  • Intro
  • Foreword
  • Acknowledgements
  • Praise for Integrating Science and Politics for Public Health
  • Contents
  • List of Contributors
  • List of Figures
  • List of Tables
  • Part I Public Health Political Science: Prospects for Partnership
  • 1 Introduction: Virchow Revisited on the Importance of Public Health Political Science
  • 1 Introducing This Book
  • 2 Conceptual Ground Clearing
  • 3 This Book in Detail
  • References
  • 2 Political Science In, Of, and With Public Health
  • 1 Introduction
  • 2 From a Sociology of Medicine to a Sociology of Public Health
  • 3 A Typology of the Interaction of Public Health and Political Science
  • 3.1 Public Health Without Political Science
  • 3.2 Political Science in Public Health
  • 3.3 Political Science of Public Health
  • 3.4 Political Science with Public Health
  • 4 Implications for Thinking About the Role of Evidence in the Making of Public Health Policy
  • 5 Conclusion
  • References
  • 3 Professions, Data, and Political Will: From the Pandemic Toward a Political Science with Public Health
  • 1 Prologue: Fermentation and Science
  • 2 Introduction
  • 3 The Political Status of the Public Health Profession: On Top or on Tap?
  • 4 The Politics of Data
  • 5 Political Will and the Politics of Agency
  • 6 Conclusion
  • References
  • 4 Public Health Policymaking, Politics, and Evidence
  • 1 Introduction
  • 2 How Does Public Health Understand Evidence?
  • 3 How Does Public Health Understand Policymaking?
  • 4 How Does Public Health Understand Politics?
  • 5 How Does Public Health Understand Community in Conceptualizations of Evidence, Politics, and Power?
  • 6 Concluding Remarks
  • References
  • Part II Politics, Evidence, and Policymaking: A Public Health Political Science Approach
  • 5 How Policy Appetites Shape, and Are Shaped by Evidence Production and Use
  • 1 Introduction
  • 2 The Rationalist Model.
  • 2.1 The Dominance of the Rationalist Model
  • 2.2 Why Has This Rationalist Model Held Strong, and Does It Matter?
  • 3 An Alternative: The Political Economy of Knowledge?
  • 3.1 Shaping the Evidence Base
  • 3.2 Shaping Evidence Mobilisation
  • 3.3 Shaping Evidence Use
  • 4 Conclusions
  • References
  • 6 Sidestepping the Stalemate: The Strategies of Public Health Actors for Circulating Evidence into the Policy Process
  • 1 Introduction
  • 2 Theory and Methods-Considering Strategies for Evidence Circulation in Local Policy Subsystem
  • 2.1 Evidence and the Policy Process
  • 2.2 The Active Transportation Policy Study
  • 3 Strategies of Public Health Actors to Circulate Evidence into the Policy Process
  • 3.1 Framing Active Transportation and Health Through Evidence
  • 3.2 Circulating Evidence Within the Local Policy Subsystem
  • 4 How Local Public Health Actors Conceive of the Policy Process
  • 4.1 Traces of the Moral High Ground in How They Engage with Other Policy Sectors
  • 4.2 Attention to Politics
  • 5 Discussion
  • References
  • 7 Beyond the Public Health/Political Science Stalemate in Health Inequalities: Can Deliberative Forums Help?
  • 1 Introduction: Mini-Publics and Deliberative Fora as a Solution to the Stalemate?
  • 2 The Case for Mini-Publics in Public Health Policy
  • 3 The Case Study: Tackling Health Inequalities in Scotland and England
  • 4 Empirical Evidence Demonstrating Greater Than Perceived Alignment Between Public Views of, and Research on, Health Inequalities
  • 4.1 What Does Existing Qualitative Research Tell Us About Public Understandings of Health Inequalities and Potential Policy Responses to These Inequalities in the UK?
  • 4.2 What Do Surveys Tell Us About Public Understandings of Health Inequalities and Potential Policy Responses to These Inequalities in the UK?.
  • 4.3 What Do Citizens' Juries Tell Us About Public Understandings of Health Inequalities and Potential Policy Responses to These Inequalities in the UK?
  • 5 Concluding Discussion
  • References
  • 8 Is Local Better? Evolving Hybrid Theorising for Local Health Policies
  • 1 The Rise of Local
  • 2 'Healthy Cities' as Policy Code, and 'Health Cities' as a Rhetoric
  • 3 Translating Knowledge or Moving It Through the System?
  • 4 Policy Transfer: Scaling up and Scaling Wide
  • 5 Framing and Entrepreneurship for Network and Systems Change
  • 6 How is Local Better?
  • References
  • 9 Select Committee Governance and the Production of Evidence: The Case of UK E-cigarettes Policy
  • 1 Introduction
  • 2 Select Committees' Impact on Policy
  • 3 Select Committees as Evidence Synthesisers and Producers
  • 4 Select Committee Governance
  • 5 Corporate Actors and Policy Influence
  • 6 UK E-cigarette Policy and the Science and Technology Committee Enquiry
  • 7 Conclusion
  • References
  • Part III Making Public Health Policy: Insights from Political Science
  • 10 The Policy and Politics of Public Health in Pandemics
  • 1 Introduction
  • 2 The H1N1 Pandemic in Nova Scotia
  • 3 How Was the H1N1 Pandemic Political?
  • 3.1 Structures and Institutions
  • 3.2 Interests
  • 3.3 Discourses and Narratives
  • 4 How Were Vaccines and Antivirals Addressed by Policy-Makers During H1N1 pandemic, and What Lessons are Relevant for the COVID-19 Pandemic?
  • 5 Conclusion
  • References
  • 11 How Can Policy Theory Help to Address the Expectations Gap in Preventive Public Health and 'Health in All Policies'?
  • 1 Introduction: The Search for Political Science Within Public Health
  • 2 Public Health Provides a Coherent Narrative on Policy Change
  • 2.1 Public Health Provides a General Narrative of Policy and Policymaking
  • 2.2 Health in All Policies (HiAP) Takes It One Step Further.
  • 3 Governments Adopt Similar Arguments, but There Is Always a Gap Between Commitments and Outcomes
  • 4 Policy Theory Relates This Gap to Bounded Rationality and Complexity
  • 4.1 Bounded Rationality Causes Uncertainty and Ambiguity
  • 4.2 Complex Policymaking Environments Constrain and Facilitate Action
  • 5 These Factors Help Explain: But not Close-The HiAP Implementation Gap
  • 5.1 Theme 1: HiAP as a Symbol for High but Unfulfilled Expectations
  • 5.2 Theme 2: Use Policy Theory Insights to Inform Programme Theory and Reframe the Evaluation of HiAP
  • 5.3 Theme 3: Political Science as a Source of Practical Lessons for Public Health
  • 6 Conclusion: What Are Policy Theories For?
  • References
  • 12 Moving Beyond Health in All Policies: Exploring How Policy Could Front and Centre the Reduction of Social Inequities in Health
  • 1 Introduction
  • 2 Public Health Policy, Healthy Public Policy, and HiAP
  • 3 HiAP's Confused Intentionality and Ambiguous Directionality
  • 3.1 Confused Intentionality: The Shortcomings of HiAP to Address Social Inequity in Health
  • 3.2 Ambiguous Directionality: The Contribution of Non-health Sectors to Health
  • 4 Towards a Framework Focused on the Reduction of Social Inequities
  • 5 Conclusion
  • References
  • 13 Mechanisms to Bridge the Gap Between Science and Politics in Evidence-Informed Policymaking: Mapping the Landscape
  • 1 Introduction
  • 1.1 Understanding the Gap Between Science and Politics in Public Health Policymaking
  • 1.2 Bridging the Gap Between Science and Politics in Public Health Policymaking
  • 2 Methods
  • 3 Mapping the Landscape
  • 3.1 Co-production of Evidence
  • 3.2 Public Deliberation of Evidence
  • 3.3 Knowledge Mobilization (KM)
  • 3.4 Expert Advisory Bodies and Roles
  • 3.5 Policy Experimentation and Evaluation
  • 4 Toward a Typology
  • 4.1 Type of Bias Addressed.
  • 4.2 Phase of the Evidence-Policy Process
  • 4.3 Relevant Policy Concerns
  • 4.4 Actors and Institutions Involved
  • 4.5 Locus of Authority
  • 4.6 Relationship with Government Actors and Institutions
  • 5 Discussion
  • References
  • 14 Conclusion: The Added Value of Political Science in, of, and with Public Health
  • 1 Epistemic Trespassing for Better Public Health Policy
  • 2 Does Public Health Political Science Add Value?
  • 3 A Development Agenda
  • References
  • Index.

Similar Items