Locating Legal Certainty in Patent Licensing.
Saved in:
: | |
---|---|
TeilnehmendeR: | |
Place / Publishing House: | Singapore : : Springer Singapore Pte. Limited,, 2022. ©2023. |
Year of Publication: | 2022 |
Edition: | 1st ed. |
Language: | English |
Online Access: | |
Physical Description: | 1 online resource (147 pages) |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Table of Contents:
- Intro
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- Contents
- About the Authors
- 1 Comparative Analysis of Policy Developments
- 1 Introduction
- 2 India
- 2.1 Overview of the Indian Patent System
- 2.2 Indian Law and Licensing
- 2.3 National IPR Policy
- 2.4 India's Digital Initiatives
- 2.5 DIPP Consultation Paper
- 2.6 The TRAI Consultation Paper and the Recommendation Papers
- 2.7 The National Digital Communications Policy
- 3 European Union
- 3.1 Overview of European Patent System
- 3.2 EU and Standardization
- 3.3 Public Consultation on Patent and Standards
- 3.4 Setting Out the EU Approach to SEPs
- 3.5 Standard Essential Patents and the Internet of Things: In-Depth Analysis, European Union
- 3.6 Guidelines on the Handling of the Antitrust Compulsory License Objection According to Huawei v. ZTE Within the Munich Procedure of Handling Patent Infringement Cases
- 3.7 EU Communication Making the Most of the EU's Innovative Potential an Intellectual Property Action Plan to Support the EU's Recovery and Resilience
- 3.8 EU Studies
- 4 United States of America (USA)
- 4.1 Overview of US Patent System
- 4.2 USA-Competition Enforcers and Licensing
- 4.3 The 2017 Antitrust Guidelines for the Licensing of Intellectual Property
- 4.4 The New Madison Approach
- 4.5 Policy Statement of Remedies for Standards-Essential Patents Subject to Voluntary F/RAND Commitments
- 4.6 Business Review Letters (BRL)
- 5 China
- 5.1 Overview of Chinese IP System
- 5.2 Standard Setting in China
- 5.3 Framework for Injunctions
- 5.4 Beijing Guidelines, 2017
- 5.5 Guangdong Guidelines, 2018
- 5.6 The Chinese Antimonopoly Law and SEPs
- 6 Japan
- 6.1 A Brief Overview of Japan's Patent System
- 6.2 Guidelines for the Use of Intellectual Property Under the Japanese Antimonopoly Act
- 6.3 Recent Technical Studies on IP and SEPs in Japan.
- 6.4 Guide to Licensing Negotiations Involving SEPs
- 6.5 Guidelines on the 'Fair Value Calculation of SEP for Multi-component Products'
- 2 SSOs' Role in Facilitating IP Policy Measures
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Why Do We Need a Standard?
- 3 Standard Setting Organizations
- 4 Importance of SSOs in Setting Essential Patents
- 4.1 Standard Setting Process in SSOs
- 4.2 Advantages and Risk of Standard Setting by SSOs
- 4.3 IPR Policies of SSOs: Understanding Disclosure and Licensing of Essential Patents
- 5 Disclosure and Licensing of Essential Patents
- 5.1 Disclosure and Licensing Requirements ETSI
- 5.2 Disclosure and Licensing Requirement of TSDSI
- 5.3 Disclosure and Licensing Requirement IEEE
- 6 FRAND Commitment and Injunction
- 3 Jurisprudence Evolved in Cases Involving Standard Essential Patents
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Disclosure Requirement
- 3 Non-disclosure at the Time of Standard Development
- 3.1 Non-disclosure Amounting to Equitable Doctrine of Implied Waiver
- 4 Injunctive Relief
- 4.1 Pre-Huawei Jurisprudence
- 4.2 Huawei v ZTE
- 4.3 Post Huawei
- 5 Developments in India
- 6 Antisuit Injunction
- 7 Conclusion
- Annexure I: Membership Application Form for TSDSI
- Annexure II: IPR Licensing Declaration Form for TSDSI
- Annexure III: IPR Information Statement and Licensing Declaration for TSDSI
- Annexure IV: IPR Information Statement for TSDSI
- Annexure V: IPR Licensing Declaration for TSDSI
- Annexure VI: Application for ETSI Membership
- Annexure VII: IPR Licensing Declaration Form for ETSI
- Annexure VIII: Statement and Licensing Declaration Form for ETSI
- Annexure IX: ETSI - IPR Information Statement Annex
- Annexure X: Optional Written Explanation of Reasons for Not Making the IPR Licensing Declaration
- Annexure XI: Letter of Assurance for Essential Patent Claims for IEEE.