Locating Legal Certainty in Patent Licensing.

• Author: Bharadwaj, Ashish.
• TeilnehmendeR: Devaiah, Vishwas H.; Gupta, Indranath.
• Place / Publishing House: Singapore : : Springer Singapore Pte. Limited,, 2022.; ©2023.
• Year of Publication: 2022
• Edition: 1st ed.
• Language: English
• Physical Description: 1 online resource (147 pages)

Table of Contents

• Intro
• Acknowledgements
• Introduction
• Contents
• About the Authors
• 1 Comparative Analysis of Policy Developments
• 1 Introduction
• 2 India
• 2.1 Overview of the Indian Patent System
• 2.2 Indian Law and Licensing
• 2.3 National IPR Policy
• 2.4 India's Digital Initiatives
• 2.5 DIPP Consultation Paper
• 2.6 The TRAI Consultation Paper and the Recommendation Papers
• 2.7 The National Digital Communications Policy
• 3 European Union
• 3.1 Overview of European Patent System
• 3.2 EU and Standardization
• 3.3 Public Consultation on Patent and Standards
• 3.4 Setting Out the EU Approach to SEPs
• 3.5 Standard Essential Patents and the Internet of Things: In-Depth Analysis, European Union
• 3.6 Guidelines on the Handling of the Antitrust Compulsory License Objection According to Huawei v. ZTE Within the Munich Procedure of Handling Patent Infringement Cases
• 3.7 EU Communication Making the Most of the EU's Innovative Potential an Intellectual Property Action Plan to Support the EU's Recovery and Resilience
• 3.8 EU Studies
• 4 United States of America (USA)
• 4.1 Overview of US Patent System
• 4.2 USA-Competition Enforcers and Licensing
• 4.3 The 2017 Antitrust Guidelines for the Licensing of Intellectual Property
• 4.4 The New Madison Approach
• 4.5 Policy Statement of Remedies for Standards-Essential Patents Subject to Voluntary F/RAND Commitments
• 4.6 Business Review Letters (BRL)
• 5 China
• 5.1 Overview of Chinese IP System
• 5.2 Standard Setting in China
• 5.3 Framework for Injunctions
• 5.4 Beijing Guidelines, 2017
• 5.5 Guangdong Guidelines, 2018
• 5.6 The Chinese Antimonopoly Law and SEPs
• 6 Japan
• 6.1 A Brief Overview of Japan's Patent System
• 6.2 Guidelines for the Use of Intellectual Property Under the Japanese Antimonopoly Act
• 6.3 Recent Technical Studies on IP and SEPs in Japan.
• 6.4 Guide to Licensing Negotiations Involving SEPs
• 6.5 Guidelines on the 'Fair Value Calculation of SEP for Multi-component Products'
• 2 SSOs' Role in Facilitating IP Policy Measures
• 1 Introduction
• 2 Why Do We Need a Standard?
• 3 Standard Setting Organizations
• 4 Importance of SSOs in Setting Essential Patents
• 4.1 Standard Setting Process in SSOs
• 4.2 Advantages and Risk of Standard Setting by SSOs
• 4.3 IPR Policies of SSOs: Understanding Disclosure and Licensing of Essential Patents
• 5 Disclosure and Licensing of Essential Patents
• 5.1 Disclosure and Licensing Requirements ETSI
• 5.2 Disclosure and Licensing Requirement of TSDSI
• 5.3 Disclosure and Licensing Requirement IEEE
• 6 FRAND Commitment and Injunction
• 3 Jurisprudence Evolved in Cases Involving Standard Essential Patents
• 1 Introduction
• 2 Disclosure Requirement
• 3 Non-disclosure at the Time of Standard Development
• 3.1 Non-disclosure Amounting to Equitable Doctrine of Implied Waiver
• 4 Injunctive Relief
• 4.1 Pre-Huawei Jurisprudence
• 4.2 Huawei v ZTE
• 4.3 Post Huawei
• 5 Developments in India
• 6 Antisuit Injunction
• 7 Conclusion
• Annexure I: Membership Application Form for TSDSI
• Annexure II: IPR Licensing Declaration Form for TSDSI
• Annexure III: IPR Information Statement and Licensing Declaration for TSDSI
• Annexure IV: IPR Information Statement for TSDSI
• Annexure V: IPR Licensing Declaration for TSDSI
• Annexure VI: Application for ETSI Membership
• Annexure VII: IPR Licensing Declaration Form for ETSI
• Annexure VIII: Statement and Licensing Declaration Form for ETSI
• Annexure IX: ETSI - IPR Information Statement Annex
• Annexure X: Optional Written Explanation of Reasons for Not Making the IPR Licensing Declaration
• Annexure XI: Letter of Assurance for Essential Patent Claims for IEEE.