Sustainable Commodity Use : : Its Governance, Legal Framework, and Future Regulatory Instruments.

Sustainable Commodity Use : : Its Governance, Legal Framework, and Future Regulatory Instruments.

Show other versions (1)
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Superior document:European Yearbook of International Economic Law Series ; v.21
:
Oehl, Maximilian Eduard.
Place / Publishing House:Cham : : Springer International Publishing AG,, 2021.
©2022.
Year of Publication:2021
Edition:1st ed.
Language:English
Series:European Yearbook of International Economic Law Series
Online Access:
Physical Description:1 online resource (321 pages)
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Table of Contents:
  • Intro
  • Contents
  • Abbreviations
  • Chapter 1: Introduction
  • References
  • Literature and IO/NGO Publications
  • Chapter 2: The Emergence of Global Commodity Governance
  • 2.1 The Task: Ensuring a Functional Commodity Sector
  • 2.1.1 Defining the Term `Commodity ́-- 2.1.1.1 General Meaning
  • 2.1.1.2 Definition According to the Havana Charter
  • 2.1.1.3 Use by WTO and UNCTAD
  • 2.1.1.4 Definition for the Purpose of This Book
  • 2.1.1.5 Types of Commodities
  • 2.1.1.6 Neighbouring Terms
  • 2.1.2 Economic, Political and Technical Circumstances of Commodity Activity
  • 2.1.3 Defining a Functional Commodity Sector
  • 2.1.4 Defining Global Commodity Governance (GCG)
  • 2.2 The Historical Emergence of GCG
  • 2.2.1 Commodity Policy Before 1945: The `Anglo-Dutch ́and `League ́Phases
  • 2.2.2 The Havana Phase
  • 2.2.3 The NIEO-UNCTAD Phase
  • 2.2.4 The Phase of `Post-Interventionism:́ Shift Towards Cooperative Agreements
  • 2.2.5 The Appearance of GCG
  • 2.3 Role of the Law
  • 2.3.1 Purpose of the Law
  • 2.3.2 Law as the Catalyst of a Functional Commodity Sector
  • 2.3.3 The Effectiveness of the Legal Framework of GCG
  • References
  • Literature and IO/NGO Publications
  • Cases
  • Chapter 3: Conceptualising TCL
  • 3.1 The Purpose of TCL
  • 3.2 The Organisational Framework of Commodity Law
  • 3.2.1 Definition of Commodity Law
  • 3.2.2 Core Conceptual Characteristics of Commodity Law
  • 3.2.2.1 Factual
  • 3.2.2.2 Policy Trade-Offs
  • 3.3 The Norms of TCL
  • 3.3.1 Sources of TCL
  • 3.3.2 Structure of TCL
  • 3.3.3 TCL in the Commodity Governance Matrix
  • References
  • Literature and IO/NGO Publications
  • Chapter 4: The Effectiveness of TCL
  • 4.1 The Principle of PSNR as Normative Corner Stone
  • 4.1.1 Competence Norm
  • 4.1.2 Rights Associated with PSNR
  • 4.1.3 The Sustainable Use Principle
  • 4.1.4 TCL Is Effective Where It Fosters Sustainable Use.
  • 4.2 The Contribution of TCL to a `Balanced ́Commodity Sector
  • 4.2.1 TCL Is Largely Indirect
  • 4.2.1.1 Human Rights
  • 4.2.1.2 Environmental Protection Norms
  • 4.2.1.3 Fiscal Framework
  • 4.2.1.4 Armed Conflict
  • 4.2.1.5 Anti-corruption
  • 4.2.1.6 Interim Conclusion
  • 4.2.2 The Limited Effectiveness of Incidents of Direct TCL
  • 4.2.2.1 Hard, Direct TCL Does Not Balance Commodity Interests Comprehensively
  • 4.2.2.1.1 Norms Balancing Economic Gain and Development
  • 4.2.2.1.2 Norms Balancing Economic Gain and Participation
  • 4.2.2.1.3 Norms Balancing Economic Gain and Environmental Protection
  • 4.2.2.1.4 Norms Balancing Economic Interests of States
  • 4.2.2.1.4.1 Aiming at Inter-State Balance: Shared Resources
  • 4.2.2.1.4.2 Commodity Trade and Development: Hard, Yet `Declaratory ́Provisions
  • 4.2.2.1.5 Integration Between Norm Subsets of TCL
  • 4.2.2.2 Direct TCL Is Largely of `Soft ́or Private Nature
  • 4.2.2.2.1 Incidents of Soft, Direct TCL
  • 4.2.2.2.1.1 Good Governance
  • 4.2.2.2.1.2 Fiscal Framework
  • 4.2.2.2.2 Incidents of Private, Direct TCL
  • 4.2.2.2.2.1 General System of Corporate Responsibility
  • 4.2.2.2.2.2 Private, Direct TCL
  • 4.2.2.2.3 Interim Conclusion
  • 4.2.2.3 Specific, Direct TCL Is Largely Private
  • 4.2.2.4 Interim Conclusion
  • 4.2.3 The Standards of TCL Are Hardly Integrated
  • 4.2.3.1 Formal Integration
  • 4.2.3.2 The Normative Deficits of Formal Integration
  • 4.2.3.3 Full Integration
  • 4.2.4 Interim Conclusion
  • 4.3 The Imbalance of TCL in Favour of Economic Objectives
  • 4.3.1 System, Shifting Paradigms and Unbalancing Effects of International Investment Law
  • 4.3.1.1 Expansion of Investment Protection
  • 4.3.1.2 Turn to SD
  • 4.3.1.3 Economic Imbalance: Investment Protection as a Matter of Conflict Between Host States and Foreign Investors
  • 4.3.1.4 Societal and Environmental Imbalance.
  • 4.3.1.5 Integrating Investment Protection into the TCL Framework
  • 4.3.2 The Law of Liberalised Trade
  • 4.3.3 Interim Conclusion
  • 4.4 Regulatory Gaps Within the TCL Framework
  • 4.5 Interim Conclusion
  • References
  • Literature and IO/NGO Publications
  • Cases
  • Chapter 5: Fostering the Effectiveness of TCL
  • 5.1 Unfolding the Normative Potential of SD
  • 5.1.1 Defining SD as the Object and Purpose of TCL
  • 5.1.1.1 Conceptual and Normative Characteristics of SD
  • 5.1.1.1.1 The Origins of SD as a Political Objective
  • 5.1.1.1.2 The Core Conceptual Contents of SD
  • 5.1.1.1.3 The General Legal Effects of SD
  • 5.1.1.2 The Legal Nature of SD
  • 5.1.1.2.1 The General Debate
  • 5.1.1.2.2 SD as Regulatory Objective
  • 5.1.1.2.2.1 Political Objectives Typically Evolve to Regulatory Objectives
  • 5.1.1.2.2.2 Law Fosters the Development of Society
  • 5.1.1.2.2.3 SD as Regulatory Objective in International Treaties
  • 5.1.1.2.2.4 SD as Regulatory Objective Beyond Treaty Regimes
  • 5.1.1.3 The Legal Impact of SD as the Object and Purpose of TCL
  • 5.1.2 Operationalising SD Through Full Integration
  • 5.1.3 Learning from International Labour Law
  • 5.1.4 Interim Conclusion
  • 5.2 ICAs as Instruments Specifying Sustainable Commodity Use
  • 5.2.1 Analysis of Current ICAs
  • 5.2.1.1 Types of ICAs
  • 5.2.1.1.1 ICAs sensu originali
  • 5.2.1.1.2 ICAs sensu stricto
  • 5.2.1.1.3 ICAs sensu lato
  • 5.2.1.2 Analysis of ICAs sensu originali and sensu stricto
  • 5.2.1.2.1 International Commodity Bodies
  • 5.2.1.2.2 ICAs sensu originali
  • 5.2.1.2.2.1 Objectives
  • 5.2.1.2.2.2 Substantive Obligations
  • 5.2.1.2.2.3 Institutional Arrangements
  • 5.2.1.2.2.4 Dispute Settlement
  • 5.2.1.2.2.5 Interim Conclusion
  • 5.2.1.2.3 ICAs sensu stricto
  • 5.2.1.2.3.1 Agreements with a Narrow Scope
  • 5.2.1.2.3.2 Broader Scope
  • 5.2.1.2.3.3 Comprehensive Scope.
  • 5.2.1.2.3.4 Interim Conclusion
  • 5.2.1.3 Some Reflections on ICAs sensu lato
  • 5.2.1.4 Interim Conclusion: Relevance of Current ICAs for GCG
  • 5.2.2 ICAs De Lege Ferenda
  • 5.2.2.1 ICAs as Instruments Codifying Balancing Norms
  • 5.2.2.1.1 General Idea: Qualifying the Policy Space Available to States
  • 5.2.2.1.2 Principle of Proportionality
  • 5.2.2.1.3 Prevention of Irreversible Effects
  • 5.2.2.1.4 Obligation for States to Detail Terms of Sustainable Use in National Regimes
  • 5.2.2.2 ICAs as Instruments Incorporating SD as Their Object and Purpose
  • 5.2.2.3 ICAs as Instruments Reinforcing the Rule of Law in the Commodity Sector
  • 5.2.2.4 Reflections on Formal Questions
  • 5.2.2.5 Interim Conclusion: ICAs as Tools Fostering a Functional Commodity Sector
  • References
  • Literature and IO/NGO Publications
  • Cases
  • Chapter 6: Conclusions
  • References
  • Literature and IO/NGO Publications
  • Annex: The Substance of TCL: An Outline.

Similar Items