Protecting the Fatherland : : Lawsuits and Political Debates in Jülich, Hesse-Cassel and Brittany (1642-1655).

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Superior document:Studies in the History of Law and Justice Series ; v.20
:
Place / Publishing House:Cham : : Springer International Publishing AG,, 2021.
{copy}2021.
Year of Publication:2021
Edition:1st ed.
Language:English
Series:Studies in the History of Law and Justice Series
Online Access:
Physical Description:1 online resource (229 pages)
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Table of Contents:
  • Intro
  • Preface
  • Acknowledgments
  • Note on Terminology
  • Contents
  • Abbreviations
  • List of Figures
  • List of Maps
  • List of Tables
  • Chapter 1: Introduction
  • 1.1 The Problem and Its Study
  • 1.2 Definitions and the Development of Terminology
  • 1.3 Methodology, Sources and Structure
  • References
  • Part I: Holy Roman Empire
  • Chapter 2: Political Language in the Holy Roman Empire (1500-1650s)
  • 2.1 German Political Thought (15th-17th century)
  • 2.2 German Fatherland Terminology
  • References
  • Chapter 3: Jülich: Pamphlets and Cologne Get-Togethers (1640s-1650s)
  • 3.1 Jülichś Early History Until the War of Succession (1609-1614)
  • 3.2 Jülich Until the Peace of Prague (1635)
  • 3.2.1 Until the Peace of Westphalia (1648)
  • 3.3 Hostile Occupation: Hessian Troops
  • 3.4 Conclusion
  • References
  • Chapter 4: Hesse-Cassel: Alledged Sedition and Law-Suits (1640s-1650s)
  • 4.1 The Lineage of the Landgravial Family: 1500-1600
  • 4.2 Maurice the Learned: Confessional Breakdown of Relations (1592-1627)
  • 4.3 Wilhelm V: The Enemy of the Emperor and Exile (1627-1636/7)
  • 4.4 Politics in Exile (1637-1640)
  • 4.5 Amelie Elisabeth: Regent, Commander, and Negotiator (1637-1650)
  • 4.6 The Nobility: Maintaining the Status Quo (1637-1646)
  • 4.7 Final Negotiations: Peace of Westphalia (1648)
  • 4.8 Landgravine and Nobility: Problems Arising (1646-1650)
  • 4.9 Preparing and Filing an Official Complaint (1647-1655)
  • 4.9.1 Remonstratio
  • 4.9.2 Mandatum Inhibitorium et Cassatorium Sine Clausula: 1647 and 1650, 1651
  • 4.9.3 Disposition or Gutachten 1648-1650
  • 4.9.4 Exceptiones sub- et obreptionis: 1651
  • 4.9.5 Mandatum Poenale Sine Clausula: 1652
  • 4.9.6 Replica: 30 March 1652
  • 4.9.7 PP: 30 March 1652
  • 4.9.8 Duplica: 22 April 1653
  • 4.9.9 Reaction to the Duplica (1653-1655?)
  • 4.9.10 Triplica: 26 June 1655.
  • 4.9.11 Ohn Vorgreiffliche Memorialien (1653-1655)
  • 4.9.12 (Draft Loco) Quatruplika: 1655
  • 4.9.13 The Agreement: The End of the Legal Conflict: 2 October 1655
  • 4.10 Conclusion
  • References
  • Part II: Kingdom of France
  • Chapter 5: Patriots in France, Political Talks Between 1500s and 1650s
  • 5.1 Political Developments: Kings, Children, and Succession
  • 5.2 Governmental Organisation: Tasks, Taxes, and Ties
  • 5.3 Political Thought: Sovereignty, Reason, and Patrie
  • References
  • Chapter 6: Brittany: Pay dÉ́tats and Don Gratuit (1648-1652)
  • 6.1 Brittanyś Early History: Successions and a Forced Union
  • 6.2 Cardinal de Richelieuś Influence and Cardinal Mazarinś Guidance
  • 6.3 The États and the Parlement of Brittany
  • 6.3.1 États Assembly and Parlement of 1649
  • 6.3.2 États-Assembly and the `Rump ́Parlement of 1651
  • 6.4 The Tax Burden in Brittany
  • 6.5 Conclusion
  • References
  • Part III: Conclusion
  • Chapter 7: Comparison of the Cases
  • 7.1 Answering Hypothesis 1: Within Small Principalities Fatherland Terminology Is Used
  • 7.2 Answering Hypothesis 2: Homogeneous Interests Stimulate the Use of Fatherland Terminology
  • 7.3 Final Remarks
  • References
  • Bibliography
  • Archival Sources
  • Jülich
  • Hesse-Cassel
  • Brittany
  • Printed Primary Sources
  • Jülich
  • Hesse-Cassel
  • Other
  • Secondary Literature
  • Index.