Non-Canonical Control in a Cross-linguistic Perspective.

Based on empirical generalizations from a wide range of languages, this volume provides insights into cross-linguistic variation in the interplay of different components of control such as the properties of the constituent hosting the controlled subject.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Superior document:Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today Series ; v.270
:
TeilnehmendeR:
Place / Publishing House:Amsterdam/Philadelphia : : John Benjamins Publishing Company,, 2021.
©2021.
Year of Publication:2021
Edition:1st ed.
Language:English
Series:Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today Series
Online Access:
Physical Description:1 online resource (298 pages)
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Table of Contents:
  • Intro
  • Non-canonical Control in a Cross-linguistic Perspective
  • Editorial page
  • Title page
  • Copyright page
  • Table of contents
  • Introduction. Non-canonical control in a cross-linguistic perspective: Introduction to the volume
  • 1. Issues in non-canonical control
  • 2. Overview of the book
  • Part I. Non-canonical control in complement clauses
  • Part II. Non-canonical control in adjunct clauses
  • Acknowledgments
  • References
  • Part I. Non-canonical control in complement clauses
  • Backward control, long distance agree, nominative case and TP/CP transparency
  • 1. Aims and goals
  • 2. Control and raising in Greek
  • 2.1 BC
  • 2.2 LDA
  • 3. An analysis of LDA
  • 4. LDA disrupted
  • 5. Conclusions
  • References
  • Agent control in passives in Romanian
  • 1. Introduction: Control with agents of passives across languages
  • 2. Control with implicit agents of passives in Romanian
  • 3. Towards an account: Why some analyses don't work
  • 4. Our analysis
  • 4.1 On the structure of 'se-passives': Halfway between actives and passives
  • 4.2 Control in se-passives
  • 4.3 Comparing our account with an alternative analysis of control in Romanian
  • 4.4 Summary
  • 5. Conclusions
  • References
  • On the obligatory versus no control split in Korean
  • 1. Introduction
  • 2. Data
  • 2.1 Control complementizers
  • 2.2 Base and inverse order
  • 2.3 The orientation of control complementizers towards attitudinal function
  • 2.4 Overt infinitival subjects
  • 2.5 Interim summary
  • 3. Analysis
  • 3.1 The control clause in the inverse order has moved
  • 3.2 The OC-NC split
  • 4. Open issues
  • 4.1 Subject control
  • 4.2 Lifting the anti-AUTHOR restriction
  • 4.3 Outlook
  • 5. Conclusion
  • References
  • Control from inside: Evidence from Japanese
  • 1. Introduction
  • 2. Data
  • 2.1 Control as force embedding
  • 2.2 Partial control
  • 2.3 De se.
  • 2.4 Nonbiunique selectional relations
  • 2.5 Forces in roots
  • 3. Interim summary
  • 4. Extension to English
  • 4.1 Subject, object and split control
  • 4.2 Partial control
  • 5. How does the force arise clause-internally?
  • 5.1 A force-specific head?
  • 5.2 Indexical agreement
  • 5.3 Creating a de se/te property
  • 6. Associative structure
  • 7. Remaining issues and conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
  • Control and covert modality in Hungarian: MECs and postverbal-only focus constructions
  • 1. Introduction
  • 2. General overview of the data
  • 2.1 Postverbal-only focus
  • 2.2 Modal existential wh-constructions
  • 3. Earlier accounts
  • 3.1 Postverbal-only focus
  • 3.2 Modal existential wh-constructions
  • 3.3 Covert modality
  • 3.4 Transparency and clause size
  • 3.5 Interim summary
  • 4. The proposal
  • 4.1 Verb movement and covert modals
  • 5. Control and raising MECs in Hungarian
  • 5.1 Control vs. raising
  • 6. Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Funding
  • References
  • Part II. Non-canonical control in adjunct clauses
  • Event control
  • 1. Introduction
  • 2. Empirical evidence
  • 2.1 Scope: Negation, co-occurrence, coordination
  • 2.2 Binding effects
  • 2.3 Event control is obligatory control
  • 3. Theoretical approach
  • 3.1 Basic assumptions of the hybrid theory of control (HTC)
  • 3.2 Event control: Technical implementation
  • 3.3 Multiple agree
  • 3.4 On the distinction between standard PRO and PROe
  • 4. Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
  • Adjunct control and the poverty of the stimulus: Availability vs. evidence
  • 1. Introduction
  • 2. What is evidence?
  • 2.1 Considerations for the input
  • 2.2 Considerations for grammatical competence
  • 3. Availability
  • 4. Evidence
  • 4.1 Direct observation
  • 4.2 Generalization from similar structures
  • 5. Universal grammar
  • 5.1 Role of the input.
  • 5.2 Competence and acquisition
  • 5.3 Predictions for the input
  • 6. Discussion
  • 6.1 Other types of control
  • 6.2 Other dependencies
  • 6.3 Role of the argument of the poverty of the stimulus
  • 6.4 Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
  • The (Null) subject of adjunct infinitives in spoken Spanish
  • 1. Introduction
  • 2. Adjunct control between predication and logophoricity
  • 3. The (null) subject of Spanish adjunct infinitives - PRO or pro?
  • 4. A corpus study of adjunct infinitives in spoken Spanish
  • 4.1 The data
  • 4.2 Annotating controller choice for quantitative analysis
  • 4.3 Results
  • 4.4 Discussion
  • 5. Adjunct control in spoken Spanish data - some observations
  • 6. Towards an analysis: Discourse linking via C and preference scales for control
  • 6.1 The case of null subjects in adjunct infinitives
  • 6.2 The case of overt subjects in adjunct infinitives
  • 6.3 On differences between types of adjunct infinitives
  • 7. Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
  • Corpora
  • Index.