AiREAS : : Phase 3: Civilian Participation - Including the Global Health Deal Proposition.
Saved in:
Superior document: | SpringerBriefs on Case Studies of Sustainable Development Series |
---|---|
: | |
Place / Publishing House: | Cham : : Springer International Publishing AG,, 2016. ©2016. |
Year of Publication: | 2016 |
Edition: | 1st ed. |
Language: | English |
Series: | SpringerBriefs on Case Studies of Sustainable Development Series
|
Online Access: | |
Physical Description: | 1 online resource (171 pages) |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
5006422869 |
---|---|
ctrlnum |
(MiAaPQ)5006422869 (Au-PeEL)EBL6422869 (OCoLC)1079003280 |
collection |
bib_alma |
record_format |
marc |
spelling |
Close, Jean-Paul. AiREAS : Phase 3: Civilian Participation - Including the Global Health Deal Proposition. 1st ed. Cham : Springer International Publishing AG, 2016. ©2016. 1 online resource (171 pages) text txt rdacontent computer c rdamedia online resource cr rdacarrier SpringerBriefs on Case Studies of Sustainable Development Series Intro -- Foreword -- Preface -- Contents -- Introduction -- Citizen Involvement -- Complex Team Effort -- References -- 1 Persuasive Communication -- 1.1 Introduction -- 1.2 University for Technology in Eindhoven (TUe) -- 1.3 Method Used -- 1.4 Research Question 1 -- 1.5 Method -- 1.5.1 Participants and Design -- 1.6 Materials and Procedure -- 1.7 Results -- 1.7.1 Hypothesis Testing -- 1.7.2 Exploratory Analysis -- 1.8 Conclusion and Discussion -- 1.9 Research Question 2 -- 1.10 Method -- 1.10.1 Participants and Design -- 1.11 Materials -- 1.12 Procedure -- 1.13 Results -- 1.13.1 Hypothesis Testing -- 1.13.2 Exploratory Analysis -- 1.14 Conclusion and Discussion -- 1.15 Research Question 3 -- 1.16 Method -- 1.16.1 Participants and Design -- 1.17 Materials and Procedure -- 1.18 Results -- 1.18.1 Hypothesis Testing -- 1.19 Exploratory Analysis -- 1.20 Conclusion and Discussion -- 1.21 Overall Conclusion and Discussion -- 1.22 Personal Reflections of the Authors -- 1.22.1 Reflection: Joyce Brouns -- 1.22.2 Reflection: Tim van den Boom -- 1.22.3 Reflection: Marjan Hagelaars -- 1.22.4 Reflection: Relinde van Loo -- 1.22.5 Reflection: Daniëlle Ramp -- Appendix I -- Appendix II: The Outcomes of the SUS Questionnaire -- Appendix III: The Reduced Outcomes of the SUS Questionnaire -- Appendix IV: Usability Evaluation on Five Criteria -- Appendix V: The Percentage of Correct Answers in the Online Questionnaire for Persuasiveness -- Reflection by Jean-Paul Close -- 2 The AiREAS Proof of Principle-POP Relating Air Quality to Health and Lifestyle -- 2.1 Introduction -- 2.2 E-health and Lifestyle -- 2.3 The POP Flowchart -- 2.4 Finding 40 Participants -- 2.5 The First Encounter -- 2.6 Feedback Collection -- 2.7 Nicolette Meeder Reports on Feedback from the First Evening Session -- 2.8 End of the Report -- 2.9 Setting the Tone -- 2.10 Data Validation. 2.11 Influencing People -- 2.12 Producing Individual Reports -- 2.13 The Results -- 2.14 Introduction to AiREAS -- 2.14.1 What Is Aireas About? -- 2.15 Core Values -- 2.15.1 Why Take Core Values as the Starting Point? -- 2.15.2 Core Value: Food -- 2.15.3 Core Value: Health -- 2.15.4 Core Value: Safety -- 2.15.5 Core Value: Self-sufficiency-Local Mutual Resilience -- 2.15.6 Core Value: Self-awareness -- 2.16 Observations -- 2.16.1 Personal Situation -- 2.16.2 Position Determination During the Measurement Period(s) -- 2.16.3 Exposure to Air Pollution -- 2.16.4 Heart Rate Variability (HRV) and Motion Measurement -- 2.16.5 Echo Vascular Tension -- 2.17 Conclusions -- 2.17.1 Information Sources -- 2.18 Specific Conclusion of the POP Project -- 2.19 Challenges Encountered -- 2.20 Innovative Results -- 3 The Backpack Project -- 3.1 Getting Participation -- 3.2 The Outcome -- 3.3 The Commuters -- 3.4 Lifestyle-Related Exposure -- 3.5 Product Innovations -- 3.6 Conclusions -- 4 New Entrepreneurship -- 4.1 The Pyramid Paradigm -- 4.1.1 The Old Money-Driven Industrial Paradigm -- 4.1.2 4× Profit -- 4.1.3 Hackathon -- 4.2 AiREAS Itself as Value -- 4.2.1 Historical Evolution -- 4.2.2 Diner Pensant -- 4.3 Quality of Our Data and Interaction -- 4.4 Conclusion -- 4.4.1 New Reward System -- 4.4.2 Global Expansion -- 5 Event-Linked Communication -- 5.1 Call for Co-creation -- 5.2 Communication Challenge -- 5.3 Medical Challenge -- 5.4 The Day of the Marathon -- 5.5 Air Quality -- 5.6 Ozone -- 5.6.1 Conclusions from a Communication Perspective -- 5.6.2 The Medical Research -- 5.7 Conclusion of the Medical Data -- 5.7.1 Overall Conclusion of the Marathon Exercise -- 6 Multicultural Context -- 6.1 Erasmus+ -- 6.1.1 Turkish Students from Turkey -- 6.1.2 Bridge to Turkey -- 6.2 Conclusion -- 7 Level 4 Sustainocratic Regional Development -- 7.1 Laudata Si. 7.2 The Big Turnaround -- 7.2.1 4 Levels of Regional Development -- 7.3 Primary resource of a city -- 7.3.1 The Choice -- 7.4 The Sustainocrat -- 7.4.1 Wrapping Up -- 7.4.2 Final Conclusion -- 8 Annex: Executive Summary and Health Deal -- 8.1 Short Summary -- 8.2 Introduction -- 8.3 AiREAS -- 8.4 ILM and POP -- 8.4.1 History and Purpose of the POP -- 8.4.2 Approach -- 8.4.3 Execution -- 8.4.4 Financial Investment -- 8.4.5 Most Important Results of the POP, Quality of Life/Wellness and Vascular Age -- 8.4.5.1 Interview -- 8.4.5.2 Vascular Aging -- 8.5 Schematic Summary, Conclusions and Recommendation -- 8.6 Reasoning from a New Socio-economic Context: Health -- 8.7 More Proof and Results -- 8.8 Conclusion -- 8.9 Worldwide Attention -- Index. Description based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources. Electronic reproduction. Ann Arbor, Michigan : ProQuest Ebook Central, 2024. Available via World Wide Web. Access may be limited to ProQuest Ebook Central affiliated libraries. Electronic books. Print version: Close, Jean-Paul AiREAS: Sustainocracy for a Healthy City Cham : Springer International Publishing AG,c2016 9783319456195 ProQuest (Firm) https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/oeawat/detail.action?docID=6422869 Click to View |
language |
English |
format |
eBook |
author |
Close, Jean-Paul. |
spellingShingle |
Close, Jean-Paul. AiREAS : Phase 3: Civilian Participation - Including the Global Health Deal Proposition. SpringerBriefs on Case Studies of Sustainable Development Series Intro -- Foreword -- Preface -- Contents -- Introduction -- Citizen Involvement -- Complex Team Effort -- References -- 1 Persuasive Communication -- 1.1 Introduction -- 1.2 University for Technology in Eindhoven (TUe) -- 1.3 Method Used -- 1.4 Research Question 1 -- 1.5 Method -- 1.5.1 Participants and Design -- 1.6 Materials and Procedure -- 1.7 Results -- 1.7.1 Hypothesis Testing -- 1.7.2 Exploratory Analysis -- 1.8 Conclusion and Discussion -- 1.9 Research Question 2 -- 1.10 Method -- 1.10.1 Participants and Design -- 1.11 Materials -- 1.12 Procedure -- 1.13 Results -- 1.13.1 Hypothesis Testing -- 1.13.2 Exploratory Analysis -- 1.14 Conclusion and Discussion -- 1.15 Research Question 3 -- 1.16 Method -- 1.16.1 Participants and Design -- 1.17 Materials and Procedure -- 1.18 Results -- 1.18.1 Hypothesis Testing -- 1.19 Exploratory Analysis -- 1.20 Conclusion and Discussion -- 1.21 Overall Conclusion and Discussion -- 1.22 Personal Reflections of the Authors -- 1.22.1 Reflection: Joyce Brouns -- 1.22.2 Reflection: Tim van den Boom -- 1.22.3 Reflection: Marjan Hagelaars -- 1.22.4 Reflection: Relinde van Loo -- 1.22.5 Reflection: Daniëlle Ramp -- Appendix I -- Appendix II: The Outcomes of the SUS Questionnaire -- Appendix III: The Reduced Outcomes of the SUS Questionnaire -- Appendix IV: Usability Evaluation on Five Criteria -- Appendix V: The Percentage of Correct Answers in the Online Questionnaire for Persuasiveness -- Reflection by Jean-Paul Close -- 2 The AiREAS Proof of Principle-POP Relating Air Quality to Health and Lifestyle -- 2.1 Introduction -- 2.2 E-health and Lifestyle -- 2.3 The POP Flowchart -- 2.4 Finding 40 Participants -- 2.5 The First Encounter -- 2.6 Feedback Collection -- 2.7 Nicolette Meeder Reports on Feedback from the First Evening Session -- 2.8 End of the Report -- 2.9 Setting the Tone -- 2.10 Data Validation. 2.11 Influencing People -- 2.12 Producing Individual Reports -- 2.13 The Results -- 2.14 Introduction to AiREAS -- 2.14.1 What Is Aireas About? -- 2.15 Core Values -- 2.15.1 Why Take Core Values as the Starting Point? -- 2.15.2 Core Value: Food -- 2.15.3 Core Value: Health -- 2.15.4 Core Value: Safety -- 2.15.5 Core Value: Self-sufficiency-Local Mutual Resilience -- 2.15.6 Core Value: Self-awareness -- 2.16 Observations -- 2.16.1 Personal Situation -- 2.16.2 Position Determination During the Measurement Period(s) -- 2.16.3 Exposure to Air Pollution -- 2.16.4 Heart Rate Variability (HRV) and Motion Measurement -- 2.16.5 Echo Vascular Tension -- 2.17 Conclusions -- 2.17.1 Information Sources -- 2.18 Specific Conclusion of the POP Project -- 2.19 Challenges Encountered -- 2.20 Innovative Results -- 3 The Backpack Project -- 3.1 Getting Participation -- 3.2 The Outcome -- 3.3 The Commuters -- 3.4 Lifestyle-Related Exposure -- 3.5 Product Innovations -- 3.6 Conclusions -- 4 New Entrepreneurship -- 4.1 The Pyramid Paradigm -- 4.1.1 The Old Money-Driven Industrial Paradigm -- 4.1.2 4× Profit -- 4.1.3 Hackathon -- 4.2 AiREAS Itself as Value -- 4.2.1 Historical Evolution -- 4.2.2 Diner Pensant -- 4.3 Quality of Our Data and Interaction -- 4.4 Conclusion -- 4.4.1 New Reward System -- 4.4.2 Global Expansion -- 5 Event-Linked Communication -- 5.1 Call for Co-creation -- 5.2 Communication Challenge -- 5.3 Medical Challenge -- 5.4 The Day of the Marathon -- 5.5 Air Quality -- 5.6 Ozone -- 5.6.1 Conclusions from a Communication Perspective -- 5.6.2 The Medical Research -- 5.7 Conclusion of the Medical Data -- 5.7.1 Overall Conclusion of the Marathon Exercise -- 6 Multicultural Context -- 6.1 Erasmus+ -- 6.1.1 Turkish Students from Turkey -- 6.1.2 Bridge to Turkey -- 6.2 Conclusion -- 7 Level 4 Sustainocratic Regional Development -- 7.1 Laudata Si. 7.2 The Big Turnaround -- 7.2.1 4 Levels of Regional Development -- 7.3 Primary resource of a city -- 7.3.1 The Choice -- 7.4 The Sustainocrat -- 7.4.1 Wrapping Up -- 7.4.2 Final Conclusion -- 8 Annex: Executive Summary and Health Deal -- 8.1 Short Summary -- 8.2 Introduction -- 8.3 AiREAS -- 8.4 ILM and POP -- 8.4.1 History and Purpose of the POP -- 8.4.2 Approach -- 8.4.3 Execution -- 8.4.4 Financial Investment -- 8.4.5 Most Important Results of the POP, Quality of Life/Wellness and Vascular Age -- 8.4.5.1 Interview -- 8.4.5.2 Vascular Aging -- 8.5 Schematic Summary, Conclusions and Recommendation -- 8.6 Reasoning from a New Socio-economic Context: Health -- 8.7 More Proof and Results -- 8.8 Conclusion -- 8.9 Worldwide Attention -- Index. |
author_facet |
Close, Jean-Paul. |
author_variant |
j p c jpc |
author_sort |
Close, Jean-Paul. |
title |
AiREAS : Phase 3: Civilian Participation - Including the Global Health Deal Proposition. |
title_sub |
Phase 3: Civilian Participation - Including the Global Health Deal Proposition. |
title_full |
AiREAS : Phase 3: Civilian Participation - Including the Global Health Deal Proposition. |
title_fullStr |
AiREAS : Phase 3: Civilian Participation - Including the Global Health Deal Proposition. |
title_full_unstemmed |
AiREAS : Phase 3: Civilian Participation - Including the Global Health Deal Proposition. |
title_auth |
AiREAS : Phase 3: Civilian Participation - Including the Global Health Deal Proposition. |
title_new |
AiREAS : |
title_sort |
aireas : phase 3: civilian participation - including the global health deal proposition. |
series |
SpringerBriefs on Case Studies of Sustainable Development Series |
series2 |
SpringerBriefs on Case Studies of Sustainable Development Series |
publisher |
Springer International Publishing AG, |
publishDate |
2016 |
physical |
1 online resource (171 pages) |
edition |
1st ed. |
contents |
Intro -- Foreword -- Preface -- Contents -- Introduction -- Citizen Involvement -- Complex Team Effort -- References -- 1 Persuasive Communication -- 1.1 Introduction -- 1.2 University for Technology in Eindhoven (TUe) -- 1.3 Method Used -- 1.4 Research Question 1 -- 1.5 Method -- 1.5.1 Participants and Design -- 1.6 Materials and Procedure -- 1.7 Results -- 1.7.1 Hypothesis Testing -- 1.7.2 Exploratory Analysis -- 1.8 Conclusion and Discussion -- 1.9 Research Question 2 -- 1.10 Method -- 1.10.1 Participants and Design -- 1.11 Materials -- 1.12 Procedure -- 1.13 Results -- 1.13.1 Hypothesis Testing -- 1.13.2 Exploratory Analysis -- 1.14 Conclusion and Discussion -- 1.15 Research Question 3 -- 1.16 Method -- 1.16.1 Participants and Design -- 1.17 Materials and Procedure -- 1.18 Results -- 1.18.1 Hypothesis Testing -- 1.19 Exploratory Analysis -- 1.20 Conclusion and Discussion -- 1.21 Overall Conclusion and Discussion -- 1.22 Personal Reflections of the Authors -- 1.22.1 Reflection: Joyce Brouns -- 1.22.2 Reflection: Tim van den Boom -- 1.22.3 Reflection: Marjan Hagelaars -- 1.22.4 Reflection: Relinde van Loo -- 1.22.5 Reflection: Daniëlle Ramp -- Appendix I -- Appendix II: The Outcomes of the SUS Questionnaire -- Appendix III: The Reduced Outcomes of the SUS Questionnaire -- Appendix IV: Usability Evaluation on Five Criteria -- Appendix V: The Percentage of Correct Answers in the Online Questionnaire for Persuasiveness -- Reflection by Jean-Paul Close -- 2 The AiREAS Proof of Principle-POP Relating Air Quality to Health and Lifestyle -- 2.1 Introduction -- 2.2 E-health and Lifestyle -- 2.3 The POP Flowchart -- 2.4 Finding 40 Participants -- 2.5 The First Encounter -- 2.6 Feedback Collection -- 2.7 Nicolette Meeder Reports on Feedback from the First Evening Session -- 2.8 End of the Report -- 2.9 Setting the Tone -- 2.10 Data Validation. 2.11 Influencing People -- 2.12 Producing Individual Reports -- 2.13 The Results -- 2.14 Introduction to AiREAS -- 2.14.1 What Is Aireas About? -- 2.15 Core Values -- 2.15.1 Why Take Core Values as the Starting Point? -- 2.15.2 Core Value: Food -- 2.15.3 Core Value: Health -- 2.15.4 Core Value: Safety -- 2.15.5 Core Value: Self-sufficiency-Local Mutual Resilience -- 2.15.6 Core Value: Self-awareness -- 2.16 Observations -- 2.16.1 Personal Situation -- 2.16.2 Position Determination During the Measurement Period(s) -- 2.16.3 Exposure to Air Pollution -- 2.16.4 Heart Rate Variability (HRV) and Motion Measurement -- 2.16.5 Echo Vascular Tension -- 2.17 Conclusions -- 2.17.1 Information Sources -- 2.18 Specific Conclusion of the POP Project -- 2.19 Challenges Encountered -- 2.20 Innovative Results -- 3 The Backpack Project -- 3.1 Getting Participation -- 3.2 The Outcome -- 3.3 The Commuters -- 3.4 Lifestyle-Related Exposure -- 3.5 Product Innovations -- 3.6 Conclusions -- 4 New Entrepreneurship -- 4.1 The Pyramid Paradigm -- 4.1.1 The Old Money-Driven Industrial Paradigm -- 4.1.2 4× Profit -- 4.1.3 Hackathon -- 4.2 AiREAS Itself as Value -- 4.2.1 Historical Evolution -- 4.2.2 Diner Pensant -- 4.3 Quality of Our Data and Interaction -- 4.4 Conclusion -- 4.4.1 New Reward System -- 4.4.2 Global Expansion -- 5 Event-Linked Communication -- 5.1 Call for Co-creation -- 5.2 Communication Challenge -- 5.3 Medical Challenge -- 5.4 The Day of the Marathon -- 5.5 Air Quality -- 5.6 Ozone -- 5.6.1 Conclusions from a Communication Perspective -- 5.6.2 The Medical Research -- 5.7 Conclusion of the Medical Data -- 5.7.1 Overall Conclusion of the Marathon Exercise -- 6 Multicultural Context -- 6.1 Erasmus+ -- 6.1.1 Turkish Students from Turkey -- 6.1.2 Bridge to Turkey -- 6.2 Conclusion -- 7 Level 4 Sustainocratic Regional Development -- 7.1 Laudata Si. 7.2 The Big Turnaround -- 7.2.1 4 Levels of Regional Development -- 7.3 Primary resource of a city -- 7.3.1 The Choice -- 7.4 The Sustainocrat -- 7.4.1 Wrapping Up -- 7.4.2 Final Conclusion -- 8 Annex: Executive Summary and Health Deal -- 8.1 Short Summary -- 8.2 Introduction -- 8.3 AiREAS -- 8.4 ILM and POP -- 8.4.1 History and Purpose of the POP -- 8.4.2 Approach -- 8.4.3 Execution -- 8.4.4 Financial Investment -- 8.4.5 Most Important Results of the POP, Quality of Life/Wellness and Vascular Age -- 8.4.5.1 Interview -- 8.4.5.2 Vascular Aging -- 8.5 Schematic Summary, Conclusions and Recommendation -- 8.6 Reasoning from a New Socio-economic Context: Health -- 8.7 More Proof and Results -- 8.8 Conclusion -- 8.9 Worldwide Attention -- Index. |
isbn |
9783319456201 9783319456195 |
callnumber-first |
H - Social Science |
callnumber-subject |
HD - Industries, Land Use, Labor |
callnumber-label |
HD72-88 |
callnumber-sort |
HD 272 288 |
genre |
Electronic books. |
genre_facet |
Electronic books. |
url |
https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/oeawat/detail.action?docID=6422869 |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
oclc_num |
1079003280 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT closejeanpaul aireasphase3civilianparticipationincludingtheglobalhealthdealproposition |
status_str |
n |
ids_txt_mv |
(MiAaPQ)5006422869 (Au-PeEL)EBL6422869 (OCoLC)1079003280 |
carrierType_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
SpringerBriefs on Case Studies of Sustainable Development Series |
is_hierarchy_title |
AiREAS : Phase 3: Civilian Participation - Including the Global Health Deal Proposition. |
container_title |
SpringerBriefs on Case Studies of Sustainable Development Series |
marc_error |
Info : MARC8 translation shorter than ISO-8859-1, choosing MARC8. --- [ 856 : z ] |
_version_ |
1792331059718782977 |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>06204nam a22004213i 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">5006422869</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">MiAaPQ</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240229073838.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="006">m o d | </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr cnu||||||||</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">240229s2016 xx o ||||0 eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9783319456201</subfield><subfield code="q">(electronic bk.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z">9783319456195</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(MiAaPQ)5006422869</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(Au-PeEL)EBL6422869</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1079003280</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">MiAaPQ</subfield><subfield code="b">eng</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield><subfield code="e">pn</subfield><subfield code="c">MiAaPQ</subfield><subfield code="d">MiAaPQ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">HD72-88</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Close, Jean-Paul.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">AiREAS :</subfield><subfield code="b">Phase 3: Civilian Participation - Including the Global Health Deal Proposition.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="250" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1st ed.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Cham :</subfield><subfield code="b">Springer International Publishing AG,</subfield><subfield code="c">2016.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="c">©2016.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 online resource (171 pages)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">computer</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">online resource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SpringerBriefs on Case Studies of Sustainable Development Series</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Intro -- Foreword -- Preface -- Contents -- Introduction -- Citizen Involvement -- Complex Team Effort -- References -- 1 Persuasive Communication -- 1.1 Introduction -- 1.2 University for Technology in Eindhoven (TUe) -- 1.3 Method Used -- 1.4 Research Question 1 -- 1.5 Method -- 1.5.1 Participants and Design -- 1.6 Materials and Procedure -- 1.7 Results -- 1.7.1 Hypothesis Testing -- 1.7.2 Exploratory Analysis -- 1.8 Conclusion and Discussion -- 1.9 Research Question 2 -- 1.10 Method -- 1.10.1 Participants and Design -- 1.11 Materials -- 1.12 Procedure -- 1.13 Results -- 1.13.1 Hypothesis Testing -- 1.13.2 Exploratory Analysis -- 1.14 Conclusion and Discussion -- 1.15 Research Question 3 -- 1.16 Method -- 1.16.1 Participants and Design -- 1.17 Materials and Procedure -- 1.18 Results -- 1.18.1 Hypothesis Testing -- 1.19 Exploratory Analysis -- 1.20 Conclusion and Discussion -- 1.21 Overall Conclusion and Discussion -- 1.22 Personal Reflections of the Authors -- 1.22.1 Reflection: Joyce Brouns -- 1.22.2 Reflection: Tim van den Boom -- 1.22.3 Reflection: Marjan Hagelaars -- 1.22.4 Reflection: Relinde van Loo -- 1.22.5 Reflection: Daniëlle Ramp -- Appendix I -- Appendix II: The Outcomes of the SUS Questionnaire -- Appendix III: The Reduced Outcomes of the SUS Questionnaire -- Appendix IV: Usability Evaluation on Five Criteria -- Appendix V: The Percentage of Correct Answers in the Online Questionnaire for Persuasiveness -- Reflection by Jean-Paul Close -- 2 The AiREAS Proof of Principle-POP Relating Air Quality to Health and Lifestyle -- 2.1 Introduction -- 2.2 E-health and Lifestyle -- 2.3 The POP Flowchart -- 2.4 Finding 40 Participants -- 2.5 The First Encounter -- 2.6 Feedback Collection -- 2.7 Nicolette Meeder Reports on Feedback from the First Evening Session -- 2.8 End of the Report -- 2.9 Setting the Tone -- 2.10 Data Validation.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">2.11 Influencing People -- 2.12 Producing Individual Reports -- 2.13 The Results -- 2.14 Introduction to AiREAS -- 2.14.1 What Is Aireas About? -- 2.15 Core Values -- 2.15.1 Why Take Core Values as the Starting Point? -- 2.15.2 Core Value: Food -- 2.15.3 Core Value: Health -- 2.15.4 Core Value: Safety -- 2.15.5 Core Value: Self-sufficiency-Local Mutual Resilience -- 2.15.6 Core Value: Self-awareness -- 2.16 Observations -- 2.16.1 Personal Situation -- 2.16.2 Position Determination During the Measurement Period(s) -- 2.16.3 Exposure to Air Pollution -- 2.16.4 Heart Rate Variability (HRV) and Motion Measurement -- 2.16.5 Echo Vascular Tension -- 2.17 Conclusions -- 2.17.1 Information Sources -- 2.18 Specific Conclusion of the POP Project -- 2.19 Challenges Encountered -- 2.20 Innovative Results -- 3 The Backpack Project -- 3.1 Getting Participation -- 3.2 The Outcome -- 3.3 The Commuters -- 3.4 Lifestyle-Related Exposure -- 3.5 Product Innovations -- 3.6 Conclusions -- 4 New Entrepreneurship -- 4.1 The Pyramid Paradigm -- 4.1.1 The Old Money-Driven Industrial Paradigm -- 4.1.2 4× Profit -- 4.1.3 Hackathon -- 4.2 AiREAS Itself as Value -- 4.2.1 Historical Evolution -- 4.2.2 Diner Pensant -- 4.3 Quality of Our Data and Interaction -- 4.4 Conclusion -- 4.4.1 New Reward System -- 4.4.2 Global Expansion -- 5 Event-Linked Communication -- 5.1 Call for Co-creation -- 5.2 Communication Challenge -- 5.3 Medical Challenge -- 5.4 The Day of the Marathon -- 5.5 Air Quality -- 5.6 Ozone -- 5.6.1 Conclusions from a Communication Perspective -- 5.6.2 The Medical Research -- 5.7 Conclusion of the Medical Data -- 5.7.1 Overall Conclusion of the Marathon Exercise -- 6 Multicultural Context -- 6.1 Erasmus+ -- 6.1.1 Turkish Students from Turkey -- 6.1.2 Bridge to Turkey -- 6.2 Conclusion -- 7 Level 4 Sustainocratic Regional Development -- 7.1 Laudata Si.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">7.2 The Big Turnaround -- 7.2.1 4 Levels of Regional Development -- 7.3 Primary resource of a city -- 7.3.1 The Choice -- 7.4 The Sustainocrat -- 7.4.1 Wrapping Up -- 7.4.2 Final Conclusion -- 8 Annex: Executive Summary and Health Deal -- 8.1 Short Summary -- 8.2 Introduction -- 8.3 AiREAS -- 8.4 ILM and POP -- 8.4.1 History and Purpose of the POP -- 8.4.2 Approach -- 8.4.3 Execution -- 8.4.4 Financial Investment -- 8.4.5 Most Important Results of the POP, Quality of Life/Wellness and Vascular Age -- 8.4.5.1 Interview -- 8.4.5.2 Vascular Aging -- 8.5 Schematic Summary, Conclusions and Recommendation -- 8.6 Reasoning from a New Socio-economic Context: Health -- 8.7 More Proof and Results -- 8.8 Conclusion -- 8.9 Worldwide Attention -- Index.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="588" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Description based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="590" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Electronic reproduction. Ann Arbor, Michigan : ProQuest Ebook Central, 2024. Available via World Wide Web. Access may be limited to ProQuest Ebook Central affiliated libraries. </subfield></datafield><datafield tag="655" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Electronic books.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Print version:</subfield><subfield code="a">Close, Jean-Paul</subfield><subfield code="t">AiREAS: Sustainocracy for a Healthy City</subfield><subfield code="d">Cham : Springer International Publishing AG,c2016</subfield><subfield code="z">9783319456195</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="797" ind1="2" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ProQuest (Firm)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="830" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">SpringerBriefs on Case Studies of Sustainable Development Series</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/oeawat/detail.action?docID=6422869</subfield><subfield code="z">Click to View</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |