Pharmacovigilance in the European Union : : Practical Implementation Across Member States.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
:
TeilnehmendeR:
Place / Publishing House:Wiesbaden : : Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH,, 2017.
©2017.
Year of Publication:2017
Edition:1st ed.
Language:English
Online Access:
Physical Description:1 online resource (136 pages)
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Table of Contents:
  • Intro
  • Contents
  • Abbreviations
  • List of Tables, Figures and Boxes
  • Preface
  • 1 Introduction
  • 1.1 Background and Terms of Reference
  • 1.2 Methodology: Selection of Countries
  • 1.3 Methodology: Research Strategy
  • 1.4 Summary of Evidence
  • 1.5 Implementation Assessment Structure
  • References
  • 2 Pharmacovigilance
  • 2.1 Fundamentals of Pharmacovigilance
  • 2.2 Importance of Pharmacovigilance for Biologicals
  • References
  • 3 The EU Pharmacovigilance System
  • 3.1 EU Institutions and Pharmacovigilance Actors
  • 3.2 Legislative Developments
  • 3.3 The Pharmacovigilance Reform: Directive 2010/84/EU and Article 102
  • References
  • 4 Timely and Correct Transposition of Pharmacovigilance across Member States
  • 4.1 Timely Transposition of Directive 2010/84/EU across Member States
  • 4.2 Correct Transposition of Directive 2010/84/EU across Member States
  • 4.2.1 Correct Transposition - Processes and Actors
  • 4.2.2 Correct Transposition - Quality and Content
  • References
  • 5 Practical Implementation in Six Member States
  • 5.1 ADR Reporting in the United Kingdom
  • 5.1.1 The System
  • 5.1.2 Perceived Challenges
  • 5.1.3 Perceived Best Practices
  • 5.2 ADR Reporting in Finland
  • 5.2.1 The System
  • 5.2.2 Perceived Challenges
  • 5.2.3 Perceived Best Practices
  • 5.3 ADR Reporting in Poland
  • 5.3.1 The System
  • 5.3.2 Perceived Challenges
  • 5.3.3 Perceived Best Practices
  • 5.4 ADR Reporting in France
  • 5.4.1 The System
  • 5.4.2 Perceived Challenges
  • 5.4.3 Perceived Best Practices
  • 5.5 ADR Reporting in Portugal
  • 5.5.1 The System
  • 5.5.2 Perceived Challenges
  • 5.5.3 Perceived Best Practices
  • 5.6 ADR Reporting in Germany
  • 5.6.1 The System
  • 5.6.2 Perceived Challenges
  • 5.6.3 Perceived Best Practices
  • References
  • 6 Challenges and Best Practices in Perspective
  • 6.1 Pharmacovigilance Systems
  • 6.2 Major Challenges.
  • 6.3 Comparison of Factors Contributing to Underreporting
  • 6.3.1 Lack of Awareness
  • 6.3.2 Complexity of ADR Reporting
  • 6.3.3 Lack of Cooperation
  • 6.3.4 Interconnectivity Problems
  • References
  • 7 Conclusions and Recommendations
  • 7.1 Specific Recommendations in Relation to Article 102
  • 7.2 General Recommendations: National Healthcare Systems and Policy Options for Pharmacovigilance
  • References.