Debating Transformations of National Citizenship.
Saved in:
Superior document: | IMISCOE Research Series |
---|---|
: | |
Place / Publishing House: | Cham : : Springer International Publishing AG,, 2018. {copy}2018. |
Year of Publication: | 2018 |
Edition: | 1st ed. |
Language: | English |
Series: | IMISCOE Research Series
|
Online Access: | |
Physical Description: | 1 online resource (341 pages) |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Table of Contents:
- Intro
- Acknowledgements
- Preface
- Contents
- About the Editor
- Contributors
- Part I: Should Citizenship Be for Sale?
- Summary: Global, European and National Questions About the Price of Citizenship
- (1) Global questions
- (2) European questions
- (3) National questions
- Dangerous Liaisons: Money and Citizenship
- Cash-for-Passports and the End of Citizenship
- Citizenship for Those who Invest into the Future of the State is Not Wrong, the Price Is the Problem
- The Price of Selling Citizenship
- Global Mobility Corridors for the Ultra-Rich. The Neoliberal Transformation of Citizenship
- The Maltese Falcon, or: my Porsche for a Passport!
- What Is Wrong with Selling Citizenship? It Corrupts Democracy!
- What Money Can't Buy: Face-to-Face Cooperation and Local Democratic Life
- If You Do not Like Selling Passports, Give Them for Free to Those Who Deserve Them
- Citizenship for Real: Its Hypocrisy, Its Randomness, Its Price
- I.
- II.
- III.
- IV.
- V.
- Trading Citizenship, Human Capital and the European Union
- Citizenship for Sale: Could and Should the EU Intervene?
- Linking Citizenship to Income Undermines European Values. We Need Shared Criteria and Guidelines for Access to EU Citizenship
- Coda
- Part II: Bloodlines and Belonging
- Bloodlines and Belonging: Time to Abandon Ius Sanguinis?
- Tainted
- Inadequate
- Unnecessary
- Ius Filiationis: A defence of Citizenship by Descent
- Not the only one tainted
- Why not ius filiationis?
- Don't abandon the children!
- Delayed citizenship for all?
- Citizenship across generations
- Tainted Law? Why History Cannot provide the Justification for Abandoning Ius Sanguinis
- Tainted by history?
- Not all types of 'descent' are the same
- Co-ethnic citizenship is a different story
- Conclusion
- Family Matters: Modernise, Don't Abandon, Ius Sanguinis.
- In a mobile world children need their parents' citizenship
- ART requires fixing family and citizenship law
- Abolishing Ius Sanguinis Citizenship: A Proposal Too Restrained and Too Radical
- The complex history of ius sanguinis citizenship
- A proposal too restrained and too radical
- How to modernise?
- Citizenship Without Magic
- The Janus-Face of Ius Sanguinis: Protecting Migrant Children and Expanding Ethnic Nations
- The Prior Question: What Do We Need State Citizenship for?
- No More Blood
- Law by Blood or Blood by Law?
- The main purposes of nationality
- Non-solidarity of states
- Limiting the Transmission of Family Advantage: Ius Sanguinis with an Expiration Date
- Protecting families but not privilege
- Provisional ius sanguinis
- Retain Ius Sanguinis, but Don't Take it Literally!
- History is not an argument
- Unity of the family
- Ius filiationis benefits
- Human rights protection at this stage
- Other ways to protect parent-child relationship
- A need for international guidelines on legal recognition of parenthood
- Distributing Some, but Not All, Rights of Citizenship According to Ius Sanguinis
- The problem of making citizenship dependent on family ties
- Limiting the scope of ius sanguinis
- Learning from Naturalisation Debates: The Right to an Appropriate Citizenship at Birth
- Don't Put the Baby in the Dirty Bathwater! A Rejoinder
- How ethnic is ius sanguinis and why does it matter?
- Why bother fixing ius sanguinis?
- Preventing statelessness
- Protecting family life
- Expressing social identity
- Opportunities for intergenerational membership
- Part III: The Return of Banishment
- The Return of Banishment: Do the New Denationalisation Policies Weaken Citizenship?
- Terrorist Expatriation: All Show, No Bite, No Future.
- Should Those Who Attack the Nation Have an Absolute Right to Remain Its Citizens?
- Terrorists Repudiate Their Own Citizenship
- It's Not About Their Citizenship, it's About Ours
- You Can't Lose What You Haven't Got: Citizenship Acquisition and Loss in Africa
- The legal provisions
- The practice
- Revocation of Citizenship of Terrorists: A Matter of Political Expediency
- Whose Bad Guys Are Terrorists?
- Human Rights for All Is Better than Citizenship Rights for Some
- Denationalisation, Assassination, Territory: Some (U.S.-Prompted) Reflections
- Beware States Piercing Holes into Citizenship
- Disowning Citizens
- Our Epoch's Little Banishments
- Deprivation of Citizenship: Is There an Issue of EU Law?
- On Producing the Alien Within: A Reply
- Part IV: Cloud Communities
- Cloud Communities: The Dawn of Global Citizenship?
- The idea of global citizenship
- Status: international legal persona
- Digital identity: blockchain technology
- Political participation: 'Cloud Communities'
- The future of citizenship: dynamic and multilayered?
- Citizenship in Cloud Cuckoo Land?
- The progressive potential: providing global legal status and enabling global civil society
- The threat to democracy: should we be ruled by voluntary associations?
- Citizenship in the Era of Blockchain-Based Virtual Nations
- Multiple shades of activism
- Beyond the blockchain
- Blockchain-based virtual nations
- Competing sovereignties
- New opportunities for experimentation
- Global Citizenship for the Stay-at-Homes
- A network model of citizenship
- More room for consensual citizenship
- A citizen's stake beyond national borders
- Global citizenship for the stay-at-homes
- A World Without Law
- A World Without Politics
- Virtual Politics, Real Guns: On Cloud Community, Violence, and Human Rights
- A World Wide Web of Citizenship.
- The false dichotomies of political community
- Corroded Leviathan
- Citizenship Forecast: Partly Cloudy with Chances of Algorithms
- The Separation of Territory and State: a Digital French Revolution?
- Assumption 1: Cloud states have no territory
- Assumption 2: Cloud states cannot exert violence
- Assumption 3: Cloud state membership is based on choice
- A Brave New Dawn? Digital Cakes, Cloudy Governance and Citizenship á la Carte
- They want citizenship? Let them have digital identities instead!
- Governance by blockchain: digital hierarchies or direct democracy?
- Citizenship as a business model?
- Old Divides, New Devices: Global Citizenship for Only Half of the World
- Escapist Technology in the Service of Neo-Feudalism
- Cloud Communities and the Materiality of the Digital
- Three problems with Orgad's argument
- Self-governance in practice: A cautionary tale
- Why not (yet?): On new divides and bad players
- Cloud Agoras: When Blockchain Technology Meets Arendt's Virtual Public Spaces
- Global Cryptodemocracy Is Possible and Desirable
- The Future of Citizenship: Global and Digital - A Rejoinder
- Cloud computing
- Political community
- Digital coercion
- Functional sovereignty
- Coda.