Deliberative Public Engagement with Science : : An Empirical Investigation.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Superior document:SpringerBriefs in Psychology Series
:
TeilnehmendeR:
Place / Publishing House:Cham : : Springer International Publishing AG,, 2018.
©2018.
Year of Publication:2018
Edition:1st ed.
Language:English
Series:SpringerBriefs in Psychology Series
Online Access:
Physical Description:1 online resource (136 pages)
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id 5005372088
ctrlnum (MiAaPQ)5005372088
(Au-PeEL)EBL5372088
(OCoLC)1078955961
collection bib_alma
record_format marc
spelling PytlikZillig, Lisa M.
Deliberative Public Engagement with Science : An Empirical Investigation.
1st ed.
Cham : Springer International Publishing AG, 2018.
©2018.
1 online resource (136 pages)
text txt rdacontent
computer c rdamedia
online resource cr rdacarrier
SpringerBriefs in Psychology Series
Intro -- Acknowledgments -- Contents -- About the Authors -- Chapter 1: The Big Picture -- 1.1 Introduction -- 1.2 Motivating Questions and Gaps -- 1.2.1 What Works? Delineating Important Public Engagement Types and Variables -- 1.2.2 For What Purposes? Assessing Engagement Effectiveness and Success -- 1.2.3 In What Contexts and Why? From Comparison to Causation -- 1.3 Advancing the Theoretical and Empirical Bases of a Science of Public Engagement -- 1.3.1 The Current State of Theory -- 1.3.2 Moving Forward -- 1.4 Focus and Overview of the Rest of this Book -- References -- Chapter 2: Specific Methods -- 2.1 Connecting Features, Processes, and Outcomes During Deliberative Discussions -- 2.2 Our Context: Future Scientists Deliberating About Nanotechnology over Time -- 2.2.1 Participants: College Students in the College Science Classroom -- 2.2.2 Discussion Topics: Nano-Biological Technologies and Human Enhancement -- 2.2.3 Repeated Measures Longitudinal Design -- 2.3 What Works? Experimentally Varied Deliberative Engagement Features -- 2.3.1 Importance of Ethical, Legal, and Social Issues (ELSI) Topics in Science Education -- 2.3.2 Characteristics of the Background Information -- 2.3.3 Prompts for Cognitive Engagement -- 2.3.4 Peer Discussion -- 2.3.5 Active Facilitation During Discussion -- 2.4 For What Deliberative Engagement Outcomes? -- 2.4.1 Knowledge -- 2.4.2 Attitudes Toward Nanotechnology -- 2.4.3 Perceptions of Actors: Nanoscientists and Policymakers -- 2.4.4 Policy Scenario: Policy Preference, Acceptance, and Support -- 2.4.5 Motivational Variables -- 2.4.6 Evaluation of Public Engagement -- 2.5 How and Why: Mediators and Moderators -- 2.5.1 Cognitive-Affective and Behavioral Engagement -- 2.5.2 Self-Reports of Influences on Attitudes -- 2.5.3 Participant and Facilitator Perceptions of Group-­Relevant Processes.
2.5.4 Assignment and Information Evaluations -- 2.5.5 Written Reponses and Comments -- 2.5.6 Data Quality Checks -- 2.5.7 Demographics and Individual Differences -- 2.6 Conclusion -- References -- Chapter 3: Knowledge -- 3.1 Why Does Knowledge Matter? -- 3.2 How Can Public Engagements Foster Increases in Knowledge? -- 3.2.1 Informational Presentation -- 3.2.2 Cognitive Engagement -- 3.2.3 Forms of Cognitive Engagement -- 3.2.4 Need for Cognition -- 3.3 What Do We Mean by Knowledge? -- 3.4 What Did They Learn? -- 3.5 What Mediates Knowledge? -- 3.6 Summary and Conclusion -- References -- Chapter 4: Attitude Change and Polarization -- 4.1 Introduction -- 4.2 The Effects of Deliberation: Unification or Polarization? -- 4.2.1 The Promises of Public Deliberation: Informed, Enlightened Consensus -- 4.2.2 Deliberation's Downfalls: Motivated Reasoning and Polarization -- 4.3 What Works, for What Purposes, Under What Conditions, and Why? -- 4.3.1 For What Purposes? -- 4.3.2 What Works, Under What Conditions, and Why? -- 4.4 Results -- 4.4.1 Attitude Change over Time -- 4.4.2 Encouraging Critical Thinking -- 4.4.3 Information Format -- 4.4.4 The Effects of Group Discussion -- 4.4.5 The Features of Group Discussion: Homogeneity and Facilitator Activity -- 4.4.6 A Potential Moderator of Homogeneity -- 4.5 Conclusion: What We Have Learned and Where to Go from Here -- References -- Chapter 5: Policy Acceptance -- 5.1 Introduction -- 5.2 A Rough Draft Theory of Policy Preference, Acceptance, and Support -- 5.2.1 For What? Definitions and Relationships Between Some Key Variables -- 5.2.2 What Works and How? Prior Research and Theory Concerning Factors Impacting Policy Acceptance and Support -- 5.3 The Current Study -- 5.3.1 The Policy Scenarios -- 5.3.2 Key Variables -- 5.4 Analyses and Results -- 5.4.1 Simple Correlations.
5.4.2 (1) Do Our Experimental Manipulations Impact Policy Acceptance/Support or Moderate the Policy Preference-­Acceptance/Support Relationship? -- 5.4.3 (2) Do Our Experimental Manipulations Impact Potential Mediators? -- 5.4.4 (3) Do Our Mediators Impact Policy Acceptance/Support or Moderate the Preference-Acceptance/Support Relationship? -- 5.5 Summary and Conclusions -- References -- Chapter 6: Conclusion and Future Directions -- References -- Index.
Description based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources.
Electronic reproduction. Ann Arbor, Michigan : ProQuest Ebook Central, 2024. Available via World Wide Web. Access may be limited to ProQuest Ebook Central affiliated libraries.
Electronic books.
Hutchens, Myiah J.
Muhlberger, Peter.
Gonzalez, Frank J.
Tomkins, Alan J.
Print version: PytlikZillig, Lisa M. Deliberative Public Engagement with Science Cham : Springer International Publishing AG,c2018 9783319781594
ProQuest (Firm)
https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/oeawat/detail.action?docID=5372088 Click to View
language English
format eBook
author PytlikZillig, Lisa M.
spellingShingle PytlikZillig, Lisa M.
Deliberative Public Engagement with Science : An Empirical Investigation.
SpringerBriefs in Psychology Series
Intro -- Acknowledgments -- Contents -- About the Authors -- Chapter 1: The Big Picture -- 1.1 Introduction -- 1.2 Motivating Questions and Gaps -- 1.2.1 What Works? Delineating Important Public Engagement Types and Variables -- 1.2.2 For What Purposes? Assessing Engagement Effectiveness and Success -- 1.2.3 In What Contexts and Why? From Comparison to Causation -- 1.3 Advancing the Theoretical and Empirical Bases of a Science of Public Engagement -- 1.3.1 The Current State of Theory -- 1.3.2 Moving Forward -- 1.4 Focus and Overview of the Rest of this Book -- References -- Chapter 2: Specific Methods -- 2.1 Connecting Features, Processes, and Outcomes During Deliberative Discussions -- 2.2 Our Context: Future Scientists Deliberating About Nanotechnology over Time -- 2.2.1 Participants: College Students in the College Science Classroom -- 2.2.2 Discussion Topics: Nano-Biological Technologies and Human Enhancement -- 2.2.3 Repeated Measures Longitudinal Design -- 2.3 What Works? Experimentally Varied Deliberative Engagement Features -- 2.3.1 Importance of Ethical, Legal, and Social Issues (ELSI) Topics in Science Education -- 2.3.2 Characteristics of the Background Information -- 2.3.3 Prompts for Cognitive Engagement -- 2.3.4 Peer Discussion -- 2.3.5 Active Facilitation During Discussion -- 2.4 For What Deliberative Engagement Outcomes? -- 2.4.1 Knowledge -- 2.4.2 Attitudes Toward Nanotechnology -- 2.4.3 Perceptions of Actors: Nanoscientists and Policymakers -- 2.4.4 Policy Scenario: Policy Preference, Acceptance, and Support -- 2.4.5 Motivational Variables -- 2.4.6 Evaluation of Public Engagement -- 2.5 How and Why: Mediators and Moderators -- 2.5.1 Cognitive-Affective and Behavioral Engagement -- 2.5.2 Self-Reports of Influences on Attitudes -- 2.5.3 Participant and Facilitator Perceptions of Group-­Relevant Processes.
2.5.4 Assignment and Information Evaluations -- 2.5.5 Written Reponses and Comments -- 2.5.6 Data Quality Checks -- 2.5.7 Demographics and Individual Differences -- 2.6 Conclusion -- References -- Chapter 3: Knowledge -- 3.1 Why Does Knowledge Matter? -- 3.2 How Can Public Engagements Foster Increases in Knowledge? -- 3.2.1 Informational Presentation -- 3.2.2 Cognitive Engagement -- 3.2.3 Forms of Cognitive Engagement -- 3.2.4 Need for Cognition -- 3.3 What Do We Mean by Knowledge? -- 3.4 What Did They Learn? -- 3.5 What Mediates Knowledge? -- 3.6 Summary and Conclusion -- References -- Chapter 4: Attitude Change and Polarization -- 4.1 Introduction -- 4.2 The Effects of Deliberation: Unification or Polarization? -- 4.2.1 The Promises of Public Deliberation: Informed, Enlightened Consensus -- 4.2.2 Deliberation's Downfalls: Motivated Reasoning and Polarization -- 4.3 What Works, for What Purposes, Under What Conditions, and Why? -- 4.3.1 For What Purposes? -- 4.3.2 What Works, Under What Conditions, and Why? -- 4.4 Results -- 4.4.1 Attitude Change over Time -- 4.4.2 Encouraging Critical Thinking -- 4.4.3 Information Format -- 4.4.4 The Effects of Group Discussion -- 4.4.5 The Features of Group Discussion: Homogeneity and Facilitator Activity -- 4.4.6 A Potential Moderator of Homogeneity -- 4.5 Conclusion: What We Have Learned and Where to Go from Here -- References -- Chapter 5: Policy Acceptance -- 5.1 Introduction -- 5.2 A Rough Draft Theory of Policy Preference, Acceptance, and Support -- 5.2.1 For What? Definitions and Relationships Between Some Key Variables -- 5.2.2 What Works and How? Prior Research and Theory Concerning Factors Impacting Policy Acceptance and Support -- 5.3 The Current Study -- 5.3.1 The Policy Scenarios -- 5.3.2 Key Variables -- 5.4 Analyses and Results -- 5.4.1 Simple Correlations.
5.4.2 (1) Do Our Experimental Manipulations Impact Policy Acceptance/Support or Moderate the Policy Preference-­Acceptance/Support Relationship? -- 5.4.3 (2) Do Our Experimental Manipulations Impact Potential Mediators? -- 5.4.4 (3) Do Our Mediators Impact Policy Acceptance/Support or Moderate the Preference-Acceptance/Support Relationship? -- 5.5 Summary and Conclusions -- References -- Chapter 6: Conclusion and Future Directions -- References -- Index.
author_facet PytlikZillig, Lisa M.
Hutchens, Myiah J.
Muhlberger, Peter.
Gonzalez, Frank J.
Tomkins, Alan J.
author_variant l m p lm lmp
author2 Hutchens, Myiah J.
Muhlberger, Peter.
Gonzalez, Frank J.
Tomkins, Alan J.
author2_variant m j h mj mjh
p m pm
f j g fj fjg
a j t aj ajt
author2_role TeilnehmendeR
TeilnehmendeR
TeilnehmendeR
TeilnehmendeR
author_sort PytlikZillig, Lisa M.
title Deliberative Public Engagement with Science : An Empirical Investigation.
title_sub An Empirical Investigation.
title_full Deliberative Public Engagement with Science : An Empirical Investigation.
title_fullStr Deliberative Public Engagement with Science : An Empirical Investigation.
title_full_unstemmed Deliberative Public Engagement with Science : An Empirical Investigation.
title_auth Deliberative Public Engagement with Science : An Empirical Investigation.
title_new Deliberative Public Engagement with Science :
title_sort deliberative public engagement with science : an empirical investigation.
series SpringerBriefs in Psychology Series
series2 SpringerBriefs in Psychology Series
publisher Springer International Publishing AG,
publishDate 2018
physical 1 online resource (136 pages)
edition 1st ed.
contents Intro -- Acknowledgments -- Contents -- About the Authors -- Chapter 1: The Big Picture -- 1.1 Introduction -- 1.2 Motivating Questions and Gaps -- 1.2.1 What Works? Delineating Important Public Engagement Types and Variables -- 1.2.2 For What Purposes? Assessing Engagement Effectiveness and Success -- 1.2.3 In What Contexts and Why? From Comparison to Causation -- 1.3 Advancing the Theoretical and Empirical Bases of a Science of Public Engagement -- 1.3.1 The Current State of Theory -- 1.3.2 Moving Forward -- 1.4 Focus and Overview of the Rest of this Book -- References -- Chapter 2: Specific Methods -- 2.1 Connecting Features, Processes, and Outcomes During Deliberative Discussions -- 2.2 Our Context: Future Scientists Deliberating About Nanotechnology over Time -- 2.2.1 Participants: College Students in the College Science Classroom -- 2.2.2 Discussion Topics: Nano-Biological Technologies and Human Enhancement -- 2.2.3 Repeated Measures Longitudinal Design -- 2.3 What Works? Experimentally Varied Deliberative Engagement Features -- 2.3.1 Importance of Ethical, Legal, and Social Issues (ELSI) Topics in Science Education -- 2.3.2 Characteristics of the Background Information -- 2.3.3 Prompts for Cognitive Engagement -- 2.3.4 Peer Discussion -- 2.3.5 Active Facilitation During Discussion -- 2.4 For What Deliberative Engagement Outcomes? -- 2.4.1 Knowledge -- 2.4.2 Attitudes Toward Nanotechnology -- 2.4.3 Perceptions of Actors: Nanoscientists and Policymakers -- 2.4.4 Policy Scenario: Policy Preference, Acceptance, and Support -- 2.4.5 Motivational Variables -- 2.4.6 Evaluation of Public Engagement -- 2.5 How and Why: Mediators and Moderators -- 2.5.1 Cognitive-Affective and Behavioral Engagement -- 2.5.2 Self-Reports of Influences on Attitudes -- 2.5.3 Participant and Facilitator Perceptions of Group-­Relevant Processes.
2.5.4 Assignment and Information Evaluations -- 2.5.5 Written Reponses and Comments -- 2.5.6 Data Quality Checks -- 2.5.7 Demographics and Individual Differences -- 2.6 Conclusion -- References -- Chapter 3: Knowledge -- 3.1 Why Does Knowledge Matter? -- 3.2 How Can Public Engagements Foster Increases in Knowledge? -- 3.2.1 Informational Presentation -- 3.2.2 Cognitive Engagement -- 3.2.3 Forms of Cognitive Engagement -- 3.2.4 Need for Cognition -- 3.3 What Do We Mean by Knowledge? -- 3.4 What Did They Learn? -- 3.5 What Mediates Knowledge? -- 3.6 Summary and Conclusion -- References -- Chapter 4: Attitude Change and Polarization -- 4.1 Introduction -- 4.2 The Effects of Deliberation: Unification or Polarization? -- 4.2.1 The Promises of Public Deliberation: Informed, Enlightened Consensus -- 4.2.2 Deliberation's Downfalls: Motivated Reasoning and Polarization -- 4.3 What Works, for What Purposes, Under What Conditions, and Why? -- 4.3.1 For What Purposes? -- 4.3.2 What Works, Under What Conditions, and Why? -- 4.4 Results -- 4.4.1 Attitude Change over Time -- 4.4.2 Encouraging Critical Thinking -- 4.4.3 Information Format -- 4.4.4 The Effects of Group Discussion -- 4.4.5 The Features of Group Discussion: Homogeneity and Facilitator Activity -- 4.4.6 A Potential Moderator of Homogeneity -- 4.5 Conclusion: What We Have Learned and Where to Go from Here -- References -- Chapter 5: Policy Acceptance -- 5.1 Introduction -- 5.2 A Rough Draft Theory of Policy Preference, Acceptance, and Support -- 5.2.1 For What? Definitions and Relationships Between Some Key Variables -- 5.2.2 What Works and How? Prior Research and Theory Concerning Factors Impacting Policy Acceptance and Support -- 5.3 The Current Study -- 5.3.1 The Policy Scenarios -- 5.3.2 Key Variables -- 5.4 Analyses and Results -- 5.4.1 Simple Correlations.
5.4.2 (1) Do Our Experimental Manipulations Impact Policy Acceptance/Support or Moderate the Policy Preference-­Acceptance/Support Relationship? -- 5.4.3 (2) Do Our Experimental Manipulations Impact Potential Mediators? -- 5.4.4 (3) Do Our Mediators Impact Policy Acceptance/Support or Moderate the Preference-Acceptance/Support Relationship? -- 5.5 Summary and Conclusions -- References -- Chapter 6: Conclusion and Future Directions -- References -- Index.
isbn 9783319781600
9783319781594
callnumber-first B - Philosophy, Psychology, Religion
callnumber-subject BF - Psychology
callnumber-label BF698-698
callnumber-sort BF 3698 3698.9
genre Electronic books.
genre_facet Electronic books.
url https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/oeawat/detail.action?docID=5372088
illustrated Not Illustrated
oclc_num 1078955961
work_keys_str_mv AT pytlikzilliglisam deliberativepublicengagementwithscienceanempiricalinvestigation
AT hutchensmyiahj deliberativepublicengagementwithscienceanempiricalinvestigation
AT muhlbergerpeter deliberativepublicengagementwithscienceanempiricalinvestigation
AT gonzalezfrankj deliberativepublicengagementwithscienceanempiricalinvestigation
AT tomkinsalanj deliberativepublicengagementwithscienceanempiricalinvestigation
status_str n
ids_txt_mv (MiAaPQ)5005372088
(Au-PeEL)EBL5372088
(OCoLC)1078955961
carrierType_str_mv cr
hierarchy_parent_title SpringerBriefs in Psychology Series
is_hierarchy_title Deliberative Public Engagement with Science : An Empirical Investigation.
container_title SpringerBriefs in Psychology Series
author2_original_writing_str_mv noLinkedField
noLinkedField
noLinkedField
noLinkedField
marc_error Info : MARC8 translation shorter than ISO-8859-1, choosing MARC8. --- [ 856 : z ]
_version_ 1792331054486388738
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>06342nam a22004693i 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">5005372088</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">MiAaPQ</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240229073831.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="006">m o d | </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr cnu||||||||</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">240229s2018 xx o ||||0 eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9783319781600</subfield><subfield code="q">(electronic bk.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z">9783319781594</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(MiAaPQ)5005372088</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(Au-PeEL)EBL5372088</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1078955961</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">MiAaPQ</subfield><subfield code="b">eng</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield><subfield code="e">pn</subfield><subfield code="c">MiAaPQ</subfield><subfield code="d">MiAaPQ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">BF698-698.9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PytlikZillig, Lisa M.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Deliberative Public Engagement with Science :</subfield><subfield code="b">An Empirical Investigation.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="250" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1st ed.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Cham :</subfield><subfield code="b">Springer International Publishing AG,</subfield><subfield code="c">2018.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="c">©2018.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 online resource (136 pages)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">computer</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">online resource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SpringerBriefs in Psychology Series</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Intro -- Acknowledgments -- Contents -- About the Authors -- Chapter 1: The Big Picture -- 1.1 Introduction -- 1.2 Motivating Questions and Gaps -- 1.2.1 What Works? Delineating Important Public Engagement Types and Variables -- 1.2.2 For What Purposes? Assessing Engagement Effectiveness and Success -- 1.2.3 In What Contexts and Why? From Comparison to Causation -- 1.3 Advancing the Theoretical and Empirical Bases of a Science of Public Engagement -- 1.3.1 The Current State of Theory -- 1.3.2 Moving Forward -- 1.4 Focus and Overview of the Rest of this Book -- References -- Chapter 2: Specific Methods -- 2.1 Connecting Features, Processes, and Outcomes During Deliberative Discussions -- 2.2 Our Context: Future Scientists Deliberating About Nanotechnology over Time -- 2.2.1 Participants: College Students in the College Science Classroom -- 2.2.2 Discussion Topics: Nano-Biological Technologies and Human Enhancement -- 2.2.3 Repeated Measures Longitudinal Design -- 2.3 What Works? Experimentally Varied Deliberative Engagement Features -- 2.3.1 Importance of Ethical, Legal, and Social Issues (ELSI) Topics in Science Education -- 2.3.2 Characteristics of the Background Information -- 2.3.3 Prompts for Cognitive Engagement -- 2.3.4 Peer Discussion -- 2.3.5 Active Facilitation During Discussion -- 2.4 For What Deliberative Engagement Outcomes? -- 2.4.1 Knowledge -- 2.4.2 Attitudes Toward Nanotechnology -- 2.4.3 Perceptions of Actors: Nanoscientists and Policymakers -- 2.4.4 Policy Scenario: Policy Preference, Acceptance, and Support -- 2.4.5 Motivational Variables -- 2.4.6 Evaluation of Public Engagement -- 2.5 How and Why: Mediators and Moderators -- 2.5.1 Cognitive-Affective and Behavioral Engagement -- 2.5.2 Self-Reports of Influences on Attitudes -- 2.5.3 Participant and Facilitator Perceptions of Group-­Relevant Processes.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">2.5.4 Assignment and Information Evaluations -- 2.5.5 Written Reponses and Comments -- 2.5.6 Data Quality Checks -- 2.5.7 Demographics and Individual Differences -- 2.6 Conclusion -- References -- Chapter 3: Knowledge -- 3.1 Why Does Knowledge Matter? -- 3.2 How Can Public Engagements Foster Increases in Knowledge? -- 3.2.1 Informational Presentation -- 3.2.2 Cognitive Engagement -- 3.2.3 Forms of Cognitive Engagement -- 3.2.4 Need for Cognition -- 3.3 What Do We Mean by Knowledge? -- 3.4 What Did They Learn? -- 3.5 What Mediates Knowledge? -- 3.6 Summary and Conclusion -- References -- Chapter 4: Attitude Change and Polarization -- 4.1 Introduction -- 4.2 The Effects of Deliberation: Unification or Polarization? -- 4.2.1 The Promises of Public Deliberation: Informed, Enlightened Consensus -- 4.2.2 Deliberation's Downfalls: Motivated Reasoning and Polarization -- 4.3 What Works, for What Purposes, Under What Conditions, and Why? -- 4.3.1 For What Purposes? -- 4.3.2 What Works, Under What Conditions, and Why? -- 4.4 Results -- 4.4.1 Attitude Change over Time -- 4.4.2 Encouraging Critical Thinking -- 4.4.3 Information Format -- 4.4.4 The Effects of Group Discussion -- 4.4.5 The Features of Group Discussion: Homogeneity and Facilitator Activity -- 4.4.6 A Potential Moderator of Homogeneity -- 4.5 Conclusion: What We Have Learned and Where to Go from Here -- References -- Chapter 5: Policy Acceptance -- 5.1 Introduction -- 5.2 A Rough Draft Theory of Policy Preference, Acceptance, and Support -- 5.2.1 For What? Definitions and Relationships Between Some Key Variables -- 5.2.2 What Works and How? Prior Research and Theory Concerning Factors Impacting Policy Acceptance and Support -- 5.3 The Current Study -- 5.3.1 The Policy Scenarios -- 5.3.2 Key Variables -- 5.4 Analyses and Results -- 5.4.1 Simple Correlations.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">5.4.2 (1) Do Our Experimental Manipulations Impact Policy Acceptance/Support or Moderate the Policy Preference-­Acceptance/Support Relationship? -- 5.4.3 (2) Do Our Experimental Manipulations Impact Potential Mediators? -- 5.4.4 (3) Do Our Mediators Impact Policy Acceptance/Support or Moderate the Preference-Acceptance/Support Relationship? -- 5.5 Summary and Conclusions -- References -- Chapter 6: Conclusion and Future Directions -- References -- Index.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="588" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Description based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="590" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Electronic reproduction. Ann Arbor, Michigan : ProQuest Ebook Central, 2024. Available via World Wide Web. Access may be limited to ProQuest Ebook Central affiliated libraries. </subfield></datafield><datafield tag="655" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Electronic books.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hutchens, Myiah J.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Muhlberger, Peter.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gonzalez, Frank J.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tomkins, Alan J.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Print version:</subfield><subfield code="a">PytlikZillig, Lisa M.</subfield><subfield code="t">Deliberative Public Engagement with Science</subfield><subfield code="d">Cham : Springer International Publishing AG,c2018</subfield><subfield code="z">9783319781594</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="797" ind1="2" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ProQuest (Firm)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="830" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">SpringerBriefs in Psychology Series</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/oeawat/detail.action?docID=5372088</subfield><subfield code="z">Click to View</subfield></datafield></record></collection>