The future of assisted suicide and euthanasia / Neil M. Gorsuch.
Saved in:
Superior document: | New forum books |
---|---|
: | |
TeilnehmendeR: | |
Year of Publication: | 2006 |
Language: | English |
Series: | New forum books.
|
Online Access: | |
Physical Description: | ix, 311 p. :; ill. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
LEADER | 04886nam a22004934a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 500483550 | ||
003 | MiAaPQ | ||
005 | 20200520144314.0 | ||
006 | m o d | | ||
007 | cr cn||||||||| | ||
008 | 050822s2006 njua sb 001 0 eng | ||
010 | |z 2005052194 | ||
015 | |a GBA636210 |2 bnb | ||
016 | 7 | |z 013437095 |2 Uk | |
016 | 7 | |z 101288727 |2 DNLM | |
020 | |z 9780691124582 (cloth : alk. paper) | ||
020 | |z 0691124582 (cloth : alk. paper) | ||
035 | |a (MiAaPQ)500483550 | ||
035 | |a (Au-PeEL)EBL483550 | ||
035 | |a (CaPaEBR)ebr10364782 | ||
035 | |a (CaONFJC)MIL245844 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)568085721 | ||
040 | |a MiAaPQ |c MiAaPQ |d MiAaPQ | ||
043 | |a n-us--- | ||
050 | 4 | |a R726 |b .G65 2006 | |
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 179.7 |2 22 |
100 | 1 | |a Gorsuch, Neil M. |q (Neil McGill), |d 1967- | |
245 | 1 | 4 | |a The future of assisted suicide and euthanasia |h [electronic resource] / |c Neil M. Gorsuch. |
260 | |a Princeton, N.J. : |b Princeton University Press, |c c2006. | ||
300 | |a ix, 311 p. : |b ill. | ||
490 | 1 | |a New forum books | |
504 | |a Includes bibliographical references (p. [285]-301) and index. | ||
505 | 0 | |a 1. Introduction -- 2. The Glucksberg and quill controversies : the judiciary's (non)resolution of the assisted suicide debate -- 2.1. The Washington due process litigation -- 2.2. The New York equal protection litigation -- 2.3. The final battle? : the Supreme Court does (and does not) decide -- 2.4. The aftermath of Glucksberg and Quill -- 3. The debate over history -- 3.1. Which history? -- 3.2. The project -- 3.3. The ancients -- 3.4. Early Christian history -- 3.5. English common law -- 3.6. Colonial American experience -- 3.7. The modern consensus on suicide and its assistance -- 3.8. The euthanasia movement -- 3.9. Prevailing law today -- 3.10. Conclusion -- 4. Arguments from fairness and equal protection : if a right to refuse, then a right to assisted suicide? -- 4.1. An act /omission distinction? -- 4.2. A causation-based distinction? -- 4.3. Toward an intent-based distinction : the insight of the double effect principle -- 4.4. Some (initial) arguments against double effect : conflating intent and foresight -- 4.5. Distinguishing suicide, assisted suicide, and euthanasia from the right to refuse : intending versus foreseeing death -- 4.6. Some (additional) criticisms of double effect as applied to the assisted suicide debate -- 4.7. Conclusion -- | |
505 | 0 | |a 5. Casey and Cruzan : do they intimate a right to assisted suicide and euthanasia? -- 5.1. The "reasoned judgment" test and its critics -- 5.2. Casey-based arguments -- 5.3. Cruzan-based arguments -- 5.4. Conclusion -- 6. Autonomy theory's implications for the debate over assisted suicide and euthanasia -- 6.1. The autonomy debate -- 6.2. The neutralist view of autonomy -- 6.3. The harm principle's competing view -- 6.4. Perfectionism and autonomy -- 6.5. The implications of autonomy theory for the assisted suicide and euthanasia debate -- 7. Legalization and the law of unintended consequences : utilitarian arguments for legalization -- 7.1. The Dutch experience : "virtually abuse-free"? -- 7.2. The Oregon experience : an "all-too conscientious" statutory regime? -- 7.3. Legalization and other unintended consequences -- 7.4. Decriminalization as a "costless" enterprise? -- 7.5. How to "balance" the costs and benefits of legalization? -- 7.6. Conclusion -- | |
505 | 0 | |a 8. Two test cases : Posner and Epstein -- 8.1. Posner's utilitarian case for assisted suicide -- 8.2. Posner's and Epstein's libertarian case for assisted suicide -- 9. An argument against legalization -- 9.1. The Inviolability of human life -- 9.2. What does it mean to respect human life as a basic good? -- 9.3. Some objections -- 9.4. The future of the Oregon experiment? -- 10. Toward a consistent end-of-life ethic : the "right to refuse" care for competent and incompetent patients -- 10.1. The inviolability of life and the "right to refuse" for competent persons -- 10.2. The "right to refuse" and infant patients -- 10.3. The "right to refuse" and incompetent adult patients -- 10.4. Conclusions -- Epilogue -- Appendix A. Certain American statutory laws banning or disapproving of assisted suicide -- Appendix B. Statistical calculations. | |
533 | |a Electronic reproduction. Ann Arbor, MI : ProQuest, 2015. Available via World Wide Web. Access may be limited to ProQuest affiliated libraries. | ||
650 | 0 | |a Assisted suicide |x Moral and ethical aspects |z United States. | |
650 | 0 | |a Assisted suicide |x Law and legislation |z United States. | |
650 | 0 | |a Euthanasia |x Moral and ethical aspects |z United States. | |
650 | 0 | |a Euthanasia |x Law and legislation |z United States. | |
655 | 4 | |a Electronic books. | |
710 | 2 | |a ProQuest (Firm) | |
830 | 0 | |a New forum books. | |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/oeawat/detail.action?docID=483550 |z Click to View |