Conventional wisdom : : the alternate Article V mechanism for proposing amendments to the U.S. Constitution / / John R. Vile.

"Article V of the Constitution allows two-thirds majorities of both houses of Congress to propose amendments to the document and a three-fourths majority of the states to ratify them. Scholars and frustrated advocates of constitutional change have often criticized this process for being too dif...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
VerfasserIn:
Place / Publishing House:Athens, Georgia : : The Universit9y of Georgia Press,, [2016]
Year of Publication:2016
Language:English
Online Access:
Physical Description:1 online resource (285 pages)
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id 5004454767
ctrlnum (MiAaPQ)5004454767
(Au-PeEL)EBL4454767
(CaPaEBR)ebr11206767
(CaONFJC)MIL906940
(OCoLC)945566977
collection bib_alma
record_format marc
spelling Vile, John R., author.
Conventional wisdom : the alternate Article V mechanism for proposing amendments to the U.S. Constitution / John R. Vile.
Athens, Georgia : The Universit9y of Georgia Press, [2016]
1 online resource (285 pages)
text rdacontent
computer rdamedia
online resource rdacarrier
Includes bibliographical references (pages 243-259) and index.
The Constitutional Convention of 1787 and its origins -- The establishment of the amending provisions in Article V and the ratification provisions in Article VII -- The history of Constitutional Amendments in the United States -- The lae Eighteenth century and Nineteenth century provide a rival set of Convention precedents -- A survey of early commentary on Article V -- The modern debate over limiting conventions -- Using criteria and ideal types to think about the big picture -- The selection and likely characteristics of delegates -- Organizationaol and logistical issues related to Article V Conventions -- Different kinds of Conventions.
"Article V of the Constitution allows two-thirds majorities of both houses of Congress to propose amendments to the document and a three-fourths majority of the states to ratify them. Scholars and frustrated advocates of constitutional change have often criticized this process for being too difficult. Despite this, state legislatures have yet to use the other primary method that Article V outlines for proposing amendments: it permits two-thirds of the state legislatures to petition Congress to call a convention to propose amendments that, like those proposed by Congress, must be ratified by three-fourths of the states. In this book, John R. Vile surveys more than two centuries of scholarship on Article V and concludes that the weight of the evidence (including a much-overlooked Federalist essay) indicates that states and Congress have the legal right to limit the scope of such conventions to a single subject and that political considerations would make a runaway convention unlikely. Charting a prudent course between those who fail to differentiate revolutionary change from constitutional change, those who fear ever using the Article V convention mechanism that the Framers clearly envisioned, and those who would vest total control of the convention in Congress, the states, or the convention itself, Vile's work will enhance modern debates on the subject." -- Back cover.
Description based on print version record.
Electronic reproduction. Ann Arbor, MI : ProQuest, 2016. Available via World Wide Web. Access may be limited to ProQuest affiliated libraries.
United States. Constitution. Article 5.
Constitutional amendments United States.
Electronic books.
Print version: Vile, John R. Conventional wisdom : the alternate Article V mechanism for proposing amendments to the U.S. Constitution. Athens, Georgia : The Universit9y of Georgia Press, [2016] xv, 266 pages ; 24 cm 9780820349008
ProQuest (Firm)
https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/oeawat/detail.action?docID=4454767 Click to View
language English
format eBook
author Vile, John R.,
spellingShingle Vile, John R.,
Conventional wisdom : the alternate Article V mechanism for proposing amendments to the U.S. Constitution /
The Constitutional Convention of 1787 and its origins -- The establishment of the amending provisions in Article V and the ratification provisions in Article VII -- The history of Constitutional Amendments in the United States -- The lae Eighteenth century and Nineteenth century provide a rival set of Convention precedents -- A survey of early commentary on Article V -- The modern debate over limiting conventions -- Using criteria and ideal types to think about the big picture -- The selection and likely characteristics of delegates -- Organizationaol and logistical issues related to Article V Conventions -- Different kinds of Conventions.
author_facet Vile, John R.,
author_variant j r v jr jrv
author_role VerfasserIn
author_sort Vile, John R.,
title Conventional wisdom : the alternate Article V mechanism for proposing amendments to the U.S. Constitution /
title_sub the alternate Article V mechanism for proposing amendments to the U.S. Constitution /
title_full Conventional wisdom : the alternate Article V mechanism for proposing amendments to the U.S. Constitution / John R. Vile.
title_fullStr Conventional wisdom : the alternate Article V mechanism for proposing amendments to the U.S. Constitution / John R. Vile.
title_full_unstemmed Conventional wisdom : the alternate Article V mechanism for proposing amendments to the U.S. Constitution / John R. Vile.
title_auth Conventional wisdom : the alternate Article V mechanism for proposing amendments to the U.S. Constitution /
title_new Conventional wisdom :
title_sort conventional wisdom : the alternate article v mechanism for proposing amendments to the u.s. constitution /
publisher The Universit9y of Georgia Press,
publishDate 2016
physical 1 online resource (285 pages)
contents The Constitutional Convention of 1787 and its origins -- The establishment of the amending provisions in Article V and the ratification provisions in Article VII -- The history of Constitutional Amendments in the United States -- The lae Eighteenth century and Nineteenth century provide a rival set of Convention precedents -- A survey of early commentary on Article V -- The modern debate over limiting conventions -- Using criteria and ideal types to think about the big picture -- The selection and likely characteristics of delegates -- Organizationaol and logistical issues related to Article V Conventions -- Different kinds of Conventions.
isbn 9780820348995 (e-book)
9780820349008
callnumber-first K - Law
callnumber-subject KF - United States
callnumber-label KF4555
callnumber-sort KF 44555 V565 42016
genre Electronic books.
genre_facet Electronic books.
geographic_facet United States.
url https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/oeawat/detail.action?docID=4454767
illustrated Not Illustrated
dewey-hundreds 300 - Social sciences
dewey-tens 340 - Law
dewey-ones 342 - Constitutional & administrative law
dewey-full 342.7303/2
dewey-sort 3342.7303 12
dewey-raw 342.7303/2
dewey-search 342.7303/2
oclc_num 945566977
work_keys_str_mv AT vilejohnr conventionalwisdomthealternatearticlevmechanismforproposingamendmentstotheusconstitution
status_str n
ids_txt_mv (MiAaPQ)5004454767
(Au-PeEL)EBL4454767
(CaPaEBR)ebr11206767
(CaONFJC)MIL906940
(OCoLC)945566977
is_hierarchy_title Conventional wisdom : the alternate Article V mechanism for proposing amendments to the U.S. Constitution /
_version_ 1792330907011514369
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03942nam a2200445 i 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">5004454767</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">MiAaPQ</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20200520144314.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="006">m o d | </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr cnu||||||||</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">150707s2016 gau ob 001 0 eng|d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z">9780820349008 (hardcover : alk. paper)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780820348995 (e-book)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(MiAaPQ)5004454767</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(Au-PeEL)EBL4454767</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(CaPaEBR)ebr11206767</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(CaONFJC)MIL906940</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)945566977</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">MiAaPQ</subfield><subfield code="b">eng</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield><subfield code="e">pn</subfield><subfield code="c">MiAaPQ</subfield><subfield code="d">MiAaPQ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="043" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">n-us---</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">KF4555</subfield><subfield code="b">.V565 2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">342.7303/2</subfield><subfield code="2">23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Vile, John R.,</subfield><subfield code="e">author.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Conventional wisdom :</subfield><subfield code="b">the alternate Article V mechanism for proposing amendments to the U.S. Constitution /</subfield><subfield code="c">John R. Vile.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Athens, Georgia :</subfield><subfield code="b">The Universit9y of Georgia Press,</subfield><subfield code="c">[2016]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 online resource (285 pages)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">text</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">computer</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">online resource</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="504" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Includes bibliographical references (pages 243-259) and index.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The Constitutional Convention of 1787 and its origins -- The establishment of the amending provisions in Article V and the ratification provisions in Article VII -- The history of Constitutional Amendments in the United States -- The lae Eighteenth century and Nineteenth century provide a rival set of Convention precedents -- A survey of early commentary on Article V -- The modern debate over limiting conventions -- Using criteria and ideal types to think about the big picture -- The selection and likely characteristics of delegates -- Organizationaol and logistical issues related to Article V Conventions -- Different kinds of Conventions.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">"Article V of the Constitution allows two-thirds majorities of both houses of Congress to propose amendments to the document and a three-fourths majority of the states to ratify them. Scholars and frustrated advocates of constitutional change have often criticized this process for being too difficult. Despite this, state legislatures have yet to use the other primary method that Article V outlines for proposing amendments: it permits two-thirds of the state legislatures to petition Congress to call a convention to propose amendments that, like those proposed by Congress, must be ratified by three-fourths of the states. In this book, John R. Vile surveys more than two centuries of scholarship on Article V and concludes that the weight of the evidence (including a much-overlooked Federalist essay) indicates that states and Congress have the legal right to limit the scope of such conventions to a single subject and that political considerations would make a runaway convention unlikely. Charting a prudent course between those who fail to differentiate revolutionary change from constitutional change, those who fear ever using the Article V convention mechanism that the Framers clearly envisioned, and those who would vest total control of the convention in Congress, the states, or the convention itself, Vile's work will enhance modern debates on the subject." -- Back cover.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="588" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Description based on print version record.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="590" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Electronic reproduction. Ann Arbor, MI : ProQuest, 2016. Available via World Wide Web. Access may be limited to ProQuest affiliated libraries.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">United States.</subfield><subfield code="t">Constitution.</subfield><subfield code="n">Article 5.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Constitutional amendments</subfield><subfield code="z">United States.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="655" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Electronic books.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Print version:</subfield><subfield code="a">Vile, John R.</subfield><subfield code="t">Conventional wisdom : the alternate Article V mechanism for proposing amendments to the U.S. Constitution.</subfield><subfield code="d">Athens, Georgia : The Universit9y of Georgia Press, [2016]</subfield><subfield code="h">xv, 266 pages ; 24 cm</subfield><subfield code="z">9780820349008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="797" ind1="2" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ProQuest (Firm)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/oeawat/detail.action?docID=4454767</subfield><subfield code="z">Click to View</subfield></datafield></record></collection>