Forensics under fire : are bad science and dueling experts corrupting criminal justice? / / Jim Fisher.
Saved in:
| : | |
|---|---|
| TeilnehmendeR: | |
| Year of Publication: | 2008 |
| Language: | English |
| Online Access: | |
| Physical Description: | xi, 324 p. |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Table of Contents:
- Forensic pathologists from hell : bungled autopsies, bad calls, and blown cases
- A question of credibility : bad reputations and the politics of death
- The sudden infant death debate Dr. Roy Meadow, Munchausen syndrome by proxy and Meadow's law
- Infants who can't breathe : illness or suffocation?
- Swollen brains and broken bones : disease or infanticide?
- Fingerprint identification : trouble in paradise
- Fingerprints never lie : except in Scotland
- Shoe print identification and foot morphology : the lay witness and the Cinderella analysis
- Bite mark identification : do teeth leave prints?
- Ear-mark identification : emerging science or bad evidence?
- Expert versus expert : the handwriting wars in the Ramsey case
- John Mark Karr : DNA Trumps the graphologists in the Ramsey case
- Hair and fiber identification : the inexact science
- DNA analysis : backlogs, sloppy work, and unqualified people
- Bullet identification : FBI style overselling the science
- The celebrity expert : Dr. Henry Lee.