Judging the Supreme Court : : constructions of motives in Bush v. Gore / / Clarke Rountree.
Saved in:
| Superior document: | Rhetoric and public affairs series |
|---|---|
| VerfasserIn: | |
| Place / Publishing House: | East Lansing : : Michigan State University Press,, [2007] 2007 |
| Year of Publication: | 2007 |
| Language: | English |
| Series: | Rhetoric and public affairs series.
|
| Online Access: | |
| Physical Description: | 1 online resource (xvi, 510 pages). |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Table of Contents:
- Judicial motives in American jurisprudence
- The road to Bush v. Gore
- The United States Supreme Court decides the election
- The dissent reconstructs majority action
- Reporters reconstruct the Supreme Court's action
- Editorialists reconstruct Bush v. Gore
- Scholars reconstruct the stay decision
- Scholars reconstruct how the court reached its decision
- Scholars reconstruct why the court reached its decision
- Scholars reconstruct who decided Bush v. Gore
- Scholars reconstruct when and where the court reached its decision and what it was doing
- Scholars reconstruct Rehnquist's concurring opinion
- Judging the Supreme Court and its judges.