Nothing to hide : the false tradeoff between privacy and security / / Daniel J. Solove.
Saved in:
: | |
---|---|
TeilnehmendeR: | |
Year of Publication: | 2011 |
Language: | English |
Online Access: | |
Physical Description: | ix, 245 p. :; ill. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Table of Contents:
- The nothing-to-hide argument
- The all-or-nothing fallacy
- The danger of deference
- Why privacy isn't merely an individual right
- The pendulum argument
- The national-security argument
- The problem with dissolving the crime-espionage distinction
- The war-powers argument and the rule of law
- The Fourth Amendment and the secrecy paradigm
- The third party doctrine and digital dossiers
- The failure of looking for a reasonable expectation of privacy
- The suspicionless-searches argument
- Should we keep the exclusionary rule?
- The first amendment as criminal procedure
- Will repealing the Patriot Act restore our privacy?
- The law-and-technology problem and the leave-it-to-the-legislature argument
- Video surveillance and the no-privacy-in-public argument
- Should the government engage in data mining?
- The Luddite argument, the Titanic phenomenon, and the fix-a-problem strategy.