The Content Governance Dilemma : : Digital Constitutionalism, Social Media and the Search for a Global Standard.
Saved in:
Superior document: | Information Technology and Global Governance Series |
---|---|
: | |
TeilnehmendeR: | |
Place / Publishing House: | Cham : : Springer International Publishing AG,, 2023. ©2023. |
Year of Publication: | 2023 |
Edition: | 1st ed. |
Language: | English |
Series: | Information Technology and Global Governance Series
|
Online Access: | |
Physical Description: | 1 online resource (153 pages) |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Table of Contents:
- Intro
- Acknowledgements
- Contents
- About the Authors
- Abbreviations
- List of Figures
- List of Tables
- Chapter 1: Introduction
- Chapter 2: The Content Governance Dilemma
- 2.1 From Content Moderation to Content Governance
- 2.2 Micro and Macro Governance Tensions
- 2.3 A Normative Dilemma
- 2.3.1 Authoritarianism
- 2.3.2 Imperialism
- 2.3.3 Anomie
- 2.4 The Potential of Digital Constitutionalism
- References
- Chapter 3: The International Law of Content Governance
- 3.1 Unveiling a Myth
- 3.2 Normative Sources
- 3.2.1 Generic Standards: Platforms as Duty-Bearers?
- 3.2.2 Specific Standards: Applicable Human Rights Treaties
- 3.3 Emergent Progressive Standards
- 3.4 Regulatory Limits
- 3.4.1 Design Constraints
- 3.4.2 Structural Constraints
- 3.5 Filling a Void
- References
- Chapter 4: Shaping Standards from Below: Insights from Civil Society
- 4.1 A Constitutional 'Voice' and 'Bridge'
- 4.2 Civil Society and Internet Bills of Rights
- 4.3 Defining Substantive Rights and Obligations
- 4.3.1 Avoiding the Traps of Intermediary Liability
- 4.3.2 The Centrality of Freedom of Expression
- 4.3.3 Setting the Boundaries of Freedom of Expression
- 4.4 Limiting Platforms' Arbitrariness Through Procedural Principles
- 4.4.1 A Rule of Law Regime
- 4.4.2 Good Governance Principles
- 4.5 Embedding Human Rights Standards into Platform Socio-Technical Design
- 4.5.1 Transposing the Rule of Law
- 4.5.2 Human Rights by Design
- 4.5.3 Automated Content Moderation
- References
- Chapter 5: Platform Policies Versus Human Rights Standards
- 5.1 Human Rights Commitments as a Window Dressing Strategy?
- 5.2 Platform Policies and Human Rights Commitments
- 5.2.1 Meta
- 5.2.2 Twitter
- 5.2.3 TikTok
- 5.2.4 YouTube
- 5.3 Substance Matters! Platform Moderation Outcomes Versus Civil Society Demands.
- 5.4 Process Matters! Platform Moderation Processes Versus Civil Society Demands
- 5.4.1 Curbing Automated Content Moderation?
- 5.4.2 Transparency Reporting: Which Standard to Adopt?
- References
- Chapter 6: Conclusion
- References
- Annex: List of Analysed Documents
- Index.