C. S. Lewis's Christian Apologetics : : Pro and Con.
In C. S. Lewis's Christian Apologetics: Pro and Con, ten articulate defenders and critics of Lewis's apologetics square off and debate the merits of Lewis's central arguments for Christian belief.
Saved in:
| Superior document: | Value Inquiry Book Series ; v.286 |
|---|---|
| : | |
| Place / Publishing House: | Boston : : BRILL,, 2015. Ã2015. |
| Year of Publication: | 2015 |
| Edition: | 1st ed. |
| Language: | English |
| Series: | Value Inquiry Book Series
|
| Online Access: | |
| Physical Description: | 1 online resource (288 pages) |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Table of Contents:
- Intro
- C. S. Lewis's Christian Apologetics: Pro and Con
- Copyright
- Dedication
- Contents
- EDITORIAL FOREWORD
- PREFACE
- INTRODUCTION: OXFORD'S BONNY APOLOGIST
- ONE: Pro: A Defense of C. S. Lewis's Argument from Desire
- TWO: Con: Quenching the Argument from Desire
- THREE: Reply to Gregory Bassham
- FOUR: Reply to Peter Williams
- FIVE: Pro: The Argument from Reason Defended
- SIX: Con: Naturalism Undefeated
- SEVEN: Reply to David Kyle Johnson
- EIGHT: Reply to Victor Reppert
- NINE: Pro: The Moral Argument is Convincing
- TEN: Con: A Critique of the Moral Argument
- ELEVEN: Reply to Erik Wielenberg
- TWELVE: Reply to David Baggett
- THIRTEEN: Pro: A Defense of C. S. Lewis's "Trilemma"
- FOURTEEN: Con: Lewis's Trilemma: Case Not Proven
- FIFTEEN: Reply to Adam Barkman
- SIXTEEN: Reply to Donald Williams
- SEVENTEEN: Pro: The Problem of Pain Defended
- EIGHTEEN: Con: C. S. Lewis on Evil: At Best a Likely Story
- NINETEEN: Reply to David L. O'Hara
- TWENTY: Reply to Philip Tallon
- WORKS CITED
- THE CONTRIBUTORS
- INDEX.