Disability and information technology : a comparative study in media regulation / / Eliza Varney, School of Law, Keele University.

"Disability and Information Technology examines the extent to which regulatory frameworks for information and communication technologies (ICTs) safeguard the rights of persons with disabilities as citizenship rights. It adopts a comparative approach focused on four case studies: Canada, the Eur...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Superior document:Cambridge disability law and policy series
:
TeilnehmendeR:
Year of Publication:2013
Language:English
Series:Cambridge disability, law and policy series.
Online Access:
Physical Description:xxiii, 288 p.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id 5001182918
ctrlnum (MiAaPQ)5001182918
(Au-PeEL)EBL1182918
(CaPaEBR)ebr10695285
(CaONFJC)MIL494683
(OCoLC)833300205
collection bib_alma
record_format marc
spelling Varney, Eliza, 1978-
Disability and information technology [electronic resource] : a comparative study in media regulation / Eliza Varney, School of Law, Keele University.
Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2013.
xxiii, 288 p.
Cambridge disability law and policy series
Includes bibliographical references (p. 263-282) and index.
Machine generated contents note: 1. The regulation of ICTs for the pursuit of citizenship rights; 2. Case study: Canada; 3. Case study: the European Union; 4. Case study: the United Kingdom; 5. Case study: the United States of America; 6. Lessons to be learnt? Reflection on the case studies.
"Disability and Information Technology examines the extent to which regulatory frameworks for information and communication technologies (ICTs) safeguard the rights of persons with disabilities as citizenship rights. It adopts a comparative approach focused on four case studies: Canada, the European Union, the United Kingdom and the United States. It focuses on the tension between social and economic values in the regulation of ICTs and calls for a regulatory approach based on a framework of principles that reflects citizenship values. The analysis identifies challenges encountered in the jurisdictions examined and points toward the rights-based approach advanced by the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities as a benchmark in protecting the rights of persons with disabilities to have equal access to information. The research draws on a wealth of resources, including legislation, cases, interviews, consultation documents and responses from organisations representing persons with disabilities"-- Provided by publisher.
Electronic reproduction. Ann Arbor, MI : ProQuest, 2015. Available via World Wide Web. Access may be limited to ProQuest affiliated libraries.
People with disabilities Information techology Case studies.
People with disabilities Services for Data processing Case studies.
Computers and people with disabilities Case studies.
People with disabilities Legal status, laws, etc. Case studies.
Mass Media Law and legislation Case studies.
Libraries and people with disabilities Case studies.
Electronic books.
ProQuest (Firm)
Cambridge disability, law and policy series.
https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/oeawat/detail.action?docID=1182918 Click to View
language English
format Electronic
eBook
author Varney, Eliza, 1978-
spellingShingle Varney, Eliza, 1978-
Disability and information technology a comparative study in media regulation /
Cambridge disability law and policy series
Machine generated contents note: 1. The regulation of ICTs for the pursuit of citizenship rights; 2. Case study: Canada; 3. Case study: the European Union; 4. Case study: the United Kingdom; 5. Case study: the United States of America; 6. Lessons to be learnt? Reflection on the case studies.
author_facet Varney, Eliza, 1978-
ProQuest (Firm)
ProQuest (Firm)
author_variant e v ev
author2 ProQuest (Firm)
author2_role TeilnehmendeR
author_corporate ProQuest (Firm)
author_sort Varney, Eliza, 1978-
title Disability and information technology a comparative study in media regulation /
title_sub a comparative study in media regulation /
title_full Disability and information technology [electronic resource] : a comparative study in media regulation / Eliza Varney, School of Law, Keele University.
title_fullStr Disability and information technology [electronic resource] : a comparative study in media regulation / Eliza Varney, School of Law, Keele University.
title_full_unstemmed Disability and information technology [electronic resource] : a comparative study in media regulation / Eliza Varney, School of Law, Keele University.
title_auth Disability and information technology a comparative study in media regulation /
title_new Disability and information technology
title_sort disability and information technology a comparative study in media regulation /
series Cambridge disability law and policy series
series2 Cambridge disability law and policy series
publisher Cambridge University Press,
publishDate 2013
physical xxiii, 288 p.
contents Machine generated contents note: 1. The regulation of ICTs for the pursuit of citizenship rights; 2. Case study: Canada; 3. Case study: the European Union; 4. Case study: the United Kingdom; 5. Case study: the United States of America; 6. Lessons to be learnt? Reflection on the case studies.
isbn 9781107057371 (electronic bk.)
callnumber-first Z - Library Science
callnumber-subject Z - Books and Writing
callnumber-label Z711
callnumber-sort Z 3711.92 H3 V37 42013
genre Electronic books.
genre_facet Case studies.
Electronic books.
url https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/oeawat/detail.action?docID=1182918
illustrated Not Illustrated
dewey-hundreds 000 - Computer science, information & general works
dewey-tens 000 - Computer science, knowledge & systems
dewey-ones 004 - Data processing & computer science
dewey-full 004.087
dewey-sort 14.087
dewey-raw 004.087
dewey-search 004.087
oclc_num 833300205
work_keys_str_mv AT varneyeliza disabilityandinformationtechnologyacomparativestudyinmediaregulation
AT proquestfirm disabilityandinformationtechnologyacomparativestudyinmediaregulation
status_str n
ids_txt_mv (MiAaPQ)5001182918
(Au-PeEL)EBL1182918
(CaPaEBR)ebr10695285
(CaONFJC)MIL494683
(OCoLC)833300205
hierarchy_parent_title Cambridge disability law and policy series
is_hierarchy_title Disability and information technology a comparative study in media regulation /
container_title Cambridge disability law and policy series
author2_original_writing_str_mv noLinkedField
_version_ 1792330750716018688
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03259nam a2200457 a 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">5001182918</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">MiAaPQ</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20200520144314.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="006">m o d | </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr cn|||||||||</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">121003s2013 enk sb 001 0 eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="010" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z"> 2012040416</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z">9780521191616 (hardback)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781107057371 (electronic bk.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(MiAaPQ)5001182918</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(Au-PeEL)EBL1182918</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(CaPaEBR)ebr10695285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(CaONFJC)MIL494683</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)833300205</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">MiAaPQ</subfield><subfield code="c">MiAaPQ</subfield><subfield code="d">MiAaPQ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Z711.92.H3</subfield><subfield code="b">V37 2013</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">004.087</subfield><subfield code="2">23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Varney, Eliza,</subfield><subfield code="d">1978-</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Disability and information technology</subfield><subfield code="h">[electronic resource] :</subfield><subfield code="b">a comparative study in media regulation /</subfield><subfield code="c">Eliza Varney, School of Law, Keele University.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cambridge :</subfield><subfield code="b">Cambridge University Press,</subfield><subfield code="c">2013.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">xxiii, 288 p.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cambridge disability law and policy series</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="504" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Includes bibliographical references (p. 263-282) and index.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Machine generated contents note: 1. The regulation of ICTs for the pursuit of citizenship rights; 2. Case study: Canada; 3. Case study: the European Union; 4. Case study: the United Kingdom; 5. Case study: the United States of America; 6. Lessons to be learnt? Reflection on the case studies.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">"Disability and Information Technology examines the extent to which regulatory frameworks for information and communication technologies (ICTs) safeguard the rights of persons with disabilities as citizenship rights. It adopts a comparative approach focused on four case studies: Canada, the European Union, the United Kingdom and the United States. It focuses on the tension between social and economic values in the regulation of ICTs and calls for a regulatory approach based on a framework of principles that reflects citizenship values. The analysis identifies challenges encountered in the jurisdictions examined and points toward the rights-based approach advanced by the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities as a benchmark in protecting the rights of persons with disabilities to have equal access to information. The research draws on a wealth of resources, including legislation, cases, interviews, consultation documents and responses from organisations representing persons with disabilities"--</subfield><subfield code="c">Provided by publisher.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="533" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Electronic reproduction. Ann Arbor, MI : ProQuest, 2015. Available via World Wide Web. Access may be limited to ProQuest affiliated libraries.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">People with disabilities</subfield><subfield code="x">Information techology</subfield><subfield code="v">Case studies.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">People with disabilities</subfield><subfield code="x">Services for</subfield><subfield code="x">Data processing</subfield><subfield code="v">Case studies.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Computers and people with disabilities</subfield><subfield code="v">Case studies.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">People with disabilities</subfield><subfield code="x">Legal status, laws, etc.</subfield><subfield code="v">Case studies.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Mass Media</subfield><subfield code="x">Law and legislation</subfield><subfield code="v">Case studies.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Libraries and people with disabilities</subfield><subfield code="v">Case studies.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="655" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Electronic books.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="710" ind1="2" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ProQuest (Firm)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="830" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Cambridge disability, law and policy series.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/oeawat/detail.action?docID=1182918</subfield><subfield code="z">Click to View</subfield></datafield></record></collection>