Disability and information technology : a comparative study in media regulation / / Eliza Varney, School of Law, Keele University.
"Disability and Information Technology examines the extent to which regulatory frameworks for information and communication technologies (ICTs) safeguard the rights of persons with disabilities as citizenship rights. It adopts a comparative approach focused on four case studies: Canada, the Eur...
Saved in:
Superior document: | Cambridge disability law and policy series |
---|---|
: | |
TeilnehmendeR: | |
Year of Publication: | 2013 |
Language: | English |
Series: | Cambridge disability, law and policy series.
|
Online Access: | |
Physical Description: | xxiii, 288 p. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
5001182918 |
---|---|
ctrlnum |
(MiAaPQ)5001182918 (Au-PeEL)EBL1182918 (CaPaEBR)ebr10695285 (CaONFJC)MIL494683 (OCoLC)833300205 |
collection |
bib_alma |
record_format |
marc |
spelling |
Varney, Eliza, 1978- Disability and information technology [electronic resource] : a comparative study in media regulation / Eliza Varney, School of Law, Keele University. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2013. xxiii, 288 p. Cambridge disability law and policy series Includes bibliographical references (p. 263-282) and index. Machine generated contents note: 1. The regulation of ICTs for the pursuit of citizenship rights; 2. Case study: Canada; 3. Case study: the European Union; 4. Case study: the United Kingdom; 5. Case study: the United States of America; 6. Lessons to be learnt? Reflection on the case studies. "Disability and Information Technology examines the extent to which regulatory frameworks for information and communication technologies (ICTs) safeguard the rights of persons with disabilities as citizenship rights. It adopts a comparative approach focused on four case studies: Canada, the European Union, the United Kingdom and the United States. It focuses on the tension between social and economic values in the regulation of ICTs and calls for a regulatory approach based on a framework of principles that reflects citizenship values. The analysis identifies challenges encountered in the jurisdictions examined and points toward the rights-based approach advanced by the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities as a benchmark in protecting the rights of persons with disabilities to have equal access to information. The research draws on a wealth of resources, including legislation, cases, interviews, consultation documents and responses from organisations representing persons with disabilities"-- Provided by publisher. Electronic reproduction. Ann Arbor, MI : ProQuest, 2015. Available via World Wide Web. Access may be limited to ProQuest affiliated libraries. People with disabilities Information techology Case studies. People with disabilities Services for Data processing Case studies. Computers and people with disabilities Case studies. People with disabilities Legal status, laws, etc. Case studies. Mass Media Law and legislation Case studies. Libraries and people with disabilities Case studies. Electronic books. ProQuest (Firm) Cambridge disability, law and policy series. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/oeawat/detail.action?docID=1182918 Click to View |
language |
English |
format |
Electronic eBook |
author |
Varney, Eliza, 1978- |
spellingShingle |
Varney, Eliza, 1978- Disability and information technology a comparative study in media regulation / Cambridge disability law and policy series Machine generated contents note: 1. The regulation of ICTs for the pursuit of citizenship rights; 2. Case study: Canada; 3. Case study: the European Union; 4. Case study: the United Kingdom; 5. Case study: the United States of America; 6. Lessons to be learnt? Reflection on the case studies. |
author_facet |
Varney, Eliza, 1978- ProQuest (Firm) ProQuest (Firm) |
author_variant |
e v ev |
author2 |
ProQuest (Firm) |
author2_role |
TeilnehmendeR |
author_corporate |
ProQuest (Firm) |
author_sort |
Varney, Eliza, 1978- |
title |
Disability and information technology a comparative study in media regulation / |
title_sub |
a comparative study in media regulation / |
title_full |
Disability and information technology [electronic resource] : a comparative study in media regulation / Eliza Varney, School of Law, Keele University. |
title_fullStr |
Disability and information technology [electronic resource] : a comparative study in media regulation / Eliza Varney, School of Law, Keele University. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Disability and information technology [electronic resource] : a comparative study in media regulation / Eliza Varney, School of Law, Keele University. |
title_auth |
Disability and information technology a comparative study in media regulation / |
title_new |
Disability and information technology |
title_sort |
disability and information technology a comparative study in media regulation / |
series |
Cambridge disability law and policy series |
series2 |
Cambridge disability law and policy series |
publisher |
Cambridge University Press, |
publishDate |
2013 |
physical |
xxiii, 288 p. |
contents |
Machine generated contents note: 1. The regulation of ICTs for the pursuit of citizenship rights; 2. Case study: Canada; 3. Case study: the European Union; 4. Case study: the United Kingdom; 5. Case study: the United States of America; 6. Lessons to be learnt? Reflection on the case studies. |
isbn |
9781107057371 (electronic bk.) |
callnumber-first |
Z - Library Science |
callnumber-subject |
Z - Books and Writing |
callnumber-label |
Z711 |
callnumber-sort |
Z 3711.92 H3 V37 42013 |
genre |
Electronic books. |
genre_facet |
Case studies. Electronic books. |
url |
https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/oeawat/detail.action?docID=1182918 |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
dewey-hundreds |
000 - Computer science, information & general works |
dewey-tens |
000 - Computer science, knowledge & systems |
dewey-ones |
004 - Data processing & computer science |
dewey-full |
004.087 |
dewey-sort |
14.087 |
dewey-raw |
004.087 |
dewey-search |
004.087 |
oclc_num |
833300205 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT varneyeliza disabilityandinformationtechnologyacomparativestudyinmediaregulation AT proquestfirm disabilityandinformationtechnologyacomparativestudyinmediaregulation |
status_str |
n |
ids_txt_mv |
(MiAaPQ)5001182918 (Au-PeEL)EBL1182918 (CaPaEBR)ebr10695285 (CaONFJC)MIL494683 (OCoLC)833300205 |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Cambridge disability law and policy series |
is_hierarchy_title |
Disability and information technology a comparative study in media regulation / |
container_title |
Cambridge disability law and policy series |
author2_original_writing_str_mv |
noLinkedField |
_version_ |
1792330750716018688 |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03259nam a2200457 a 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">5001182918</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">MiAaPQ</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20200520144314.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="006">m o d | </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr cn|||||||||</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">121003s2013 enk sb 001 0 eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="010" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z"> 2012040416</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z">9780521191616 (hardback)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781107057371 (electronic bk.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(MiAaPQ)5001182918</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(Au-PeEL)EBL1182918</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(CaPaEBR)ebr10695285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(CaONFJC)MIL494683</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)833300205</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">MiAaPQ</subfield><subfield code="c">MiAaPQ</subfield><subfield code="d">MiAaPQ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Z711.92.H3</subfield><subfield code="b">V37 2013</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">004.087</subfield><subfield code="2">23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Varney, Eliza,</subfield><subfield code="d">1978-</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Disability and information technology</subfield><subfield code="h">[electronic resource] :</subfield><subfield code="b">a comparative study in media regulation /</subfield><subfield code="c">Eliza Varney, School of Law, Keele University.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cambridge :</subfield><subfield code="b">Cambridge University Press,</subfield><subfield code="c">2013.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">xxiii, 288 p.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cambridge disability law and policy series</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="504" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Includes bibliographical references (p. 263-282) and index.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Machine generated contents note: 1. The regulation of ICTs for the pursuit of citizenship rights; 2. Case study: Canada; 3. Case study: the European Union; 4. Case study: the United Kingdom; 5. Case study: the United States of America; 6. Lessons to be learnt? Reflection on the case studies.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">"Disability and Information Technology examines the extent to which regulatory frameworks for information and communication technologies (ICTs) safeguard the rights of persons with disabilities as citizenship rights. It adopts a comparative approach focused on four case studies: Canada, the European Union, the United Kingdom and the United States. It focuses on the tension between social and economic values in the regulation of ICTs and calls for a regulatory approach based on a framework of principles that reflects citizenship values. The analysis identifies challenges encountered in the jurisdictions examined and points toward the rights-based approach advanced by the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities as a benchmark in protecting the rights of persons with disabilities to have equal access to information. The research draws on a wealth of resources, including legislation, cases, interviews, consultation documents and responses from organisations representing persons with disabilities"--</subfield><subfield code="c">Provided by publisher.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="533" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Electronic reproduction. Ann Arbor, MI : ProQuest, 2015. Available via World Wide Web. Access may be limited to ProQuest affiliated libraries.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">People with disabilities</subfield><subfield code="x">Information techology</subfield><subfield code="v">Case studies.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">People with disabilities</subfield><subfield code="x">Services for</subfield><subfield code="x">Data processing</subfield><subfield code="v">Case studies.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Computers and people with disabilities</subfield><subfield code="v">Case studies.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">People with disabilities</subfield><subfield code="x">Legal status, laws, etc.</subfield><subfield code="v">Case studies.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Mass Media</subfield><subfield code="x">Law and legislation</subfield><subfield code="v">Case studies.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Libraries and people with disabilities</subfield><subfield code="v">Case studies.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="655" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Electronic books.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="710" ind1="2" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ProQuest (Firm)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="830" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Cambridge disability, law and policy series.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/oeawat/detail.action?docID=1182918</subfield><subfield code="z">Click to View</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |