Our bodies, whose property? / Anne Phillips.

"No one wants to be treated like an object, regarded as an item of property, or put up for sale. Yet many people frame personal autonomy in terms of self-ownership, representing themselves as property owners with the right to do as they wish with their bodies. Others do not use the language of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
:
TeilnehmendeR:
Year of Publication:2013
Language:English
Online Access:
Physical Description:viii, 202 p.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id 5001131685
ctrlnum (MiAaPQ)5001131685
(Au-PeEL)EBL1131685
(CaPaEBR)ebr10699912
(CaONFJC)MIL489780
(OCoLC)843882796
collection bib_alma
record_format marc
spelling Phillips, Anne, 1950-
Our bodies, whose property? [electronic resource] / Anne Phillips.
Princeton : Princeton University Press, 2013.
viii, 202 p.
Includes bibliographical references and index.
"No one wants to be treated like an object, regarded as an item of property, or put up for sale. Yet many people frame personal autonomy in terms of self-ownership, representing themselves as property owners with the right to do as they wish with their bodies. Others do not use the language of property, but are similarly insistent on the rights of free individuals to decide for themselves whether to engage in commercial transactions for sex, reproduction, or organ sales. Drawing on analyses of rape, surrogacy, and markets in human organs, Our Bodies, Whose Property? challenges notions of freedom based on ownership of our bodies and argues against the normalization of markets in bodily services and parts. Anne Phillips explores the risks associated with metaphors of property and the reasons why the commodification of the body remains problematic. What, she asks, is wrong with thinking of oneself as the owner of one's body? What is wrong with making our bodies available for rent or sale? What, if anything, is the difference between markets in sex, reproduction, or human body parts, and the other markets we commonly applaud? Phillips contends that body markets occupy the outer edges of a continuum that is, in some way, a feature of all labor markets. But she also emphasizes that we all have bodies, and considers the implications of this otherwise banal fact for equality. Bodies remind us of shared vulnerability, alerting us to the common experience of living as embodied beings in the same world. Examining the complex issue of body exceptionalism, Our Bodies, Whose Property? demonstrates that treating the body as property makes human equality harder to comprehend"-- Provided by publisher.
Electronic reproduction. Ann Arbor, MI : ProQuest, 2015. Available via World Wide Web. Access may be limited to ProQuest affiliated libraries.
Liberty.
Capitalism.
Human body.
Property.
Electronic books.
ProQuest (Firm)
https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/oeawat/detail.action?docID=1131685 Click to View
language English
format Electronic
eBook
author Phillips, Anne, 1950-
spellingShingle Phillips, Anne, 1950-
Our bodies, whose property?
author_facet Phillips, Anne, 1950-
ProQuest (Firm)
ProQuest (Firm)
author_variant a p ap
author2 ProQuest (Firm)
author2_role TeilnehmendeR
author_corporate ProQuest (Firm)
author_sort Phillips, Anne, 1950-
title Our bodies, whose property?
title_full Our bodies, whose property? [electronic resource] / Anne Phillips.
title_fullStr Our bodies, whose property? [electronic resource] / Anne Phillips.
title_full_unstemmed Our bodies, whose property? [electronic resource] / Anne Phillips.
title_auth Our bodies, whose property?
title_new Our bodies, whose property?
title_sort our bodies, whose property?
publisher Princeton University Press,
publishDate 2013
physical viii, 202 p.
isbn 9781400846368 (electronic bk.)
callnumber-first J - Political Science
callnumber-subject JC - Political Theory
callnumber-label JC585
callnumber-sort JC 3585 P444 42013
genre Electronic books.
genre_facet Electronic books.
url https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/oeawat/detail.action?docID=1131685
illustrated Not Illustrated
dewey-hundreds 300 - Social sciences
dewey-tens 320 - Political science
dewey-ones 323 - Civil & political rights
dewey-full 323.44
dewey-sort 3323.44
dewey-raw 323.44
dewey-search 323.44
oclc_num 843882796
work_keys_str_mv AT phillipsanne ourbodieswhoseproperty
AT proquestfirm ourbodieswhoseproperty
status_str n
ids_txt_mv (MiAaPQ)5001131685
(Au-PeEL)EBL1131685
(CaPaEBR)ebr10699912
(CaONFJC)MIL489780
(OCoLC)843882796
is_hierarchy_title Our bodies, whose property?
author2_original_writing_str_mv noLinkedField
_version_ 1792330745939755008
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03048nam a2200397 a 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">5001131685</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">MiAaPQ</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20200520144314.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="006">m o d | </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr cn|||||||||</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">130122s2013 nju sb 001 0 eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="010" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z"> 2012046764</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z">9780691150864 (hardback)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781400846368 (electronic bk.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(MiAaPQ)5001131685</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(Au-PeEL)EBL1131685</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(CaPaEBR)ebr10699912</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(CaONFJC)MIL489780</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)843882796</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">MiAaPQ</subfield><subfield code="c">MiAaPQ</subfield><subfield code="d">MiAaPQ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">JC585</subfield><subfield code="b">.P444 2013</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">323.44</subfield><subfield code="2">23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Phillips, Anne,</subfield><subfield code="d">1950-</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Our bodies, whose property?</subfield><subfield code="h">[electronic resource] /</subfield><subfield code="c">Anne Phillips.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Princeton :</subfield><subfield code="b">Princeton University Press,</subfield><subfield code="c">2013.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">viii, 202 p.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="504" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Includes bibliographical references and index.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">"No one wants to be treated like an object, regarded as an item of property, or put up for sale. Yet many people frame personal autonomy in terms of self-ownership, representing themselves as property owners with the right to do as they wish with their bodies. Others do not use the language of property, but are similarly insistent on the rights of free individuals to decide for themselves whether to engage in commercial transactions for sex, reproduction, or organ sales. Drawing on analyses of rape, surrogacy, and markets in human organs, Our Bodies, Whose Property? challenges notions of freedom based on ownership of our bodies and argues against the normalization of markets in bodily services and parts. Anne Phillips explores the risks associated with metaphors of property and the reasons why the commodification of the body remains problematic. What, she asks, is wrong with thinking of oneself as the owner of one's body? What is wrong with making our bodies available for rent or sale? What, if anything, is the difference between markets in sex, reproduction, or human body parts, and the other markets we commonly applaud? Phillips contends that body markets occupy the outer edges of a continuum that is, in some way, a feature of all labor markets. But she also emphasizes that we all have bodies, and considers the implications of this otherwise banal fact for equality. Bodies remind us of shared vulnerability, alerting us to the common experience of living as embodied beings in the same world. Examining the complex issue of body exceptionalism, Our Bodies, Whose Property? demonstrates that treating the body as property makes human equality harder to comprehend"--</subfield><subfield code="c">Provided by publisher.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="533" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Electronic reproduction. Ann Arbor, MI : ProQuest, 2015. Available via World Wide Web. Access may be limited to ProQuest affiliated libraries.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Liberty.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Capitalism.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Human body.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Property.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="655" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Electronic books.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="710" ind1="2" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ProQuest (Firm)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/oeawat/detail.action?docID=1131685</subfield><subfield code="z">Click to View</subfield></datafield></record></collection>