Against autonomy : justifying coercive paternalism / / by Sarah Conly.

"Since Mill's seminal work On Liberty, philosophers and political theorists have accepted that we should respect the decisions of individual agents when those decisions affect no one other than themselves. Indeed, to respect autonomy is often understood to be the chief way to bear witness...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
:
TeilnehmendeR:
Year of Publication:2013
Language:English
Online Access:
Physical Description:viii, 206 p.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
LEADER 02651nam a2200409 a 4500
001 5001057526
003 MiAaPQ
005 20200520144314.0
006 m o d |
007 cr cn|||||||||
008 120522s2013 enk s 000 0 eng d
010 |z  2012021094 
020 |z 9781107024847 (hardback) 
020 |a 9781139845076 (electronic bk.) 
035 |a (MiAaPQ)5001057526 
035 |a (Au-PeEL)EBL1057526 
035 |a (CaPaEBR)ebr10628061 
035 |a (CaONFJC)MIL414877 
035 |a (OCoLC)818659219 
040 |a MiAaPQ  |c MiAaPQ  |d MiAaPQ 
050 4 |a JA71  |b .C575 2013 
082 0 4 |a 320.01  |2 23 
245 0 0 |a Against autonomy  |h [electronic resource] :  |b justifying coercive paternalism /  |c by Sarah Conly. 
260 |a Cambridge :  |b Cambridge University Press,  |c 2013. 
300 |a viii, 206 p. 
505 8 |a Machine generated contents note: Introduction; 1. Why value autonomy?; 2. Individuality; 3. Alienation, authenticity, and affect; 4. Misuse and abuse: perfectionism and preferences; 5. Misuse and abuse: punishment and privacy; 6. Applications; 7. Final justifications. 
520 |a "Since Mill's seminal work On Liberty, philosophers and political theorists have accepted that we should respect the decisions of individual agents when those decisions affect no one other than themselves. Indeed, to respect autonomy is often understood to be the chief way to bear witness to the intrinsic value of persons. In this book, Sarah Conly rejects the idea of autonomy as inviolable. Drawing on sources from behavioural economics and social psychology, she argues that we are so often irrational in making our decisions that our autonomous choices often undercut the achievement of our own goals. Thus in many cases it would advance our goals more effectively if government were to prevent us from acting in accordance with our decisions. Her argument challenges widely held views of moral agency, democratic values and the public/private distinction, and will interest readers in ethics, political philosophy, political theory and philosophy of law"--  |c Provided by publisher. 
533 |a Electronic reproduction. Ann Arbor, MI : ProQuest, 2015. Available via World Wide Web. Access may be limited to ProQuest affiliated libraries. 
650 0 |a Decision making  |x Political aspects. 
650 0 |a Decision making  |x Philosophy. 
650 0 |a Paternalism. 
650 0 |a Autonomy (Philosophy) 
650 0 |a Choice (Psychology) 
655 4 |a Electronic books. 
700 1 |a Conly, Sarah. 
710 2 |a ProQuest (Firm) 
856 4 0 |u https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/oeawat/detail.action?docID=1057526  |z Click to View